Hello Joel,
Am 28.09.21 um 01:12 schrieb Joel Sherrill:
The Microblaze port is interesting for attribution. I did initial work
on it. Hesham added to that and got Hello on a board. Alex is close to
submitting the port in a nice state.
This is almost seven years across three developers.. The o
OK
Thanks
Chris
On 27/9/21 10:49 pm, Ryan Long wrote:
> Hi,
>
> For this series of patches, I
>
> - Removed #define for size of the discardBuff
> - Fixed code preventing patchset from building
>
> Thanks,
> Ryan
>
> Ryan Long (7):
> CoverageRanges.cc: Fix formatting
> TraceReader: Convert
On 28/9/21 7:28 am, Ryan Long wrote:
> CID 1063892: Copy into fixed size buffer in process().
>
> Closes #4424
> ---
> misc/bin2c/rtems-bin2c.c | 9 +
> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/misc/bin2c/rtems-bin2c.c b/misc/bin2c/rtems-bin2c.c
> index 8e32d25..1668063 100644
>
The Microblaze port is interesting for attribution. I did initial work on
it. Hesham added to that and got Hello on a board. Alex is close to
submitting the port in a nice state.
This is almost seven years across three developers.. The original work
predates source code reorganisation. Alex delete
CID 1063892: Copy into fixed size buffer in process().
Closes #4424
---
misc/bin2c/rtems-bin2c.c | 9 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+)
diff --git a/misc/bin2c/rtems-bin2c.c b/misc/bin2c/rtems-bin2c.c
index 8e32d25..1668063 100644
--- a/misc/bin2c/rtems-bin2c.c
+++ b/misc/bin2c/rtems-bi
This adds some rules how an attribution for sponsored development should
look like.
---
Note: This patch is more or less an early draft. See the following discussion
for more background:
https://lists.rtems.org/pipermail/devel/2021-September/069465.html
Points that need discussion:
* Are there
---
tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.h | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.h b/tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.h
index aa89860..7078837 100644
--- a/tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.h
+++ b/tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.h
@@ -44,9 +44,9 @
---
tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.h | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.h
b/tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.h
index 59b5d23..636df3a 100644
--- a/tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.h
+++ b/tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.h
@@ -22,7 +22,6 @@ names
---
tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.cc | 46 +++-
1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.cc b/tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.cc
index 58c177a..0df9617 100644
--- a/tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.cc
+++ b/tester/
---
tester/covoar/TraceWriterBase.h | 3 ++-
tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.cc | 38 +-
tester/covoar/TraceWriterQEMU.h | 2 +-
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tester/covoar/TraceWriterBase.h b/tester/covoar/TraceWriterBase.h
---
tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.cc | 15 +++
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.cc
b/tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.cc
index d02b555..771f808 100644
--- a/tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.cc
+++ b/tester/covoar/TraceRe
---
tester/covoar/ObjdumpProcessor.cc | 4 +-
tester/covoar/ObjdumpProcessor.h| 2 +-
tester/covoar/TargetBase.cc | 6 +-
tester/covoar/TargetBase.h | 4 +-
tester/covoar/TraceReaderBase.h | 4 +-
tester/covoar/TraceReaderLogQEMU.cc | 128 --
Hi,
For this series of patches, I
- Removed #define for size of the discardBuff
- Fixed code preventing patchset from building
Thanks,
Ryan
Ryan Long (7):
CoverageRanges.cc: Fix formatting
TraceReader: Convert to C++
TraceWriter: Convert to C++
TraceReaderLogQEMU.cc: Fix formatting
Tr
---
tester/covoar/CoverageRanges.cc | 13 +
tester/covoar/CoverageRanges.h | 13 +++--
2 files changed, 12 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tester/covoar/CoverageRanges.cc b/tester/covoar/CoverageRanges.cc
index 159c556..cfd58df 100644
--- a/tester/covoar/CoverageR
Hello Chris,
Am 27.09.21 um 10:51 schrieb Chris Johns:
On 27/9/21 6:24 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
same like for another patch set: There is a pending discussion for this one.
Yeap and so we need to resolve it.
I have reordered your original post so the chat follows. I hope that is OK?
O
On 27/9/21 6:24 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
> same like for another patch set: There is a pending discussion for this one.
Yeap and so we need to resolve it.
I have reordered your original post so the chat follows. I hope that is OK?
> Is there still an open point left of can I push the patche
Hello,
same like for another patch set: There is a pending discussion for this one.
Chris: Back when I posted the patch set you mentioned that you are not
entirely happy about it in a discord chat (about 17.08.2021 6:50 in UTC
time zone). Is there still an open point left of can I push the pat
On 27/9/21 6:17 pm, Christian MAUDERER wrote:
> Hello,
>
> if I didn't miss a documentation patch regarding this, the topic is still
> open.
> I delayed it a bit because I didn't had the time back then and I think Chris
> was
> quite busy too at that time. I hope now is the right time to re-star
Hello,
if I didn't miss a documentation patch regarding this, the topic is
still open. I delayed it a bit because I didn't had the time back then
and I think Chris was quite busy too at that time. I hope now is the
right time to re-start the discussion.
Am 21.07.21 um 08:58 schrieb Chris Joh
19 matches
Mail list logo