On 26/01/2022 23:07, Kinsey Moore wrote:
diff --git a/cpukit/libmisc/stackchk/check.c b/cpukit/libmisc/stackchk/check.c
index a2b63345d9..9119f8d940 100644
--- a/cpukit/libmisc/stackchk/check.c
+++ b/cpukit/libmisc/stackchk/check.c
@@ -487,6 +487,12 @@ void
On 27/01/2022 03:24, Chris Johns wrote:
On 25/1/22 5:37 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 25/01/2022 01:09, Chris Johns wrote:
On 25/1/22 1:39 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
how do we want to proceed with the integration of the new validation test suite?
At the moment it is not clear to me what
On 25/1/22 5:37 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 25/01/2022 01:09, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 25/1/22 1:39 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> how do we want to proceed with the integration of the new validation test
>>> suite?
>>> At the moment it is not clear to me what issues are left to resolve and
When the stack checker is not enabled, the stack checker reporting
function can still be called. This prevents that call from performing a
null memory access in trying to find the high water mark if the stack
checker was never initialized.
This also introduces a test to ensure this call does not
Looks ok to me especially since it doesn't appear to add anything. :)
--joel
On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 4:05 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> GCC versions prior to 6.1 used a RTEMS thread model based on
> rtems_gxx_*() functions. GCC version 6.1 or later uses the
> self-contained synchronization
GCC versions prior to 6.1 used a RTEMS thread model based on
rtems_gxx_*() functions. GCC version 6.1 or later uses the
self-contained synchronization objects of Newlib for the
RTEMS thread model.
Remove the obsolete implementation.
Close #3143.
---
cpukit/include/rtems/gxx_wrappers.h
