Thanks. All pushed.
Hopefully the next batch will not be that difficult.
On Mon, Feb 28, 2022 at 2:12 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 1/3/22 3:08 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> > This series of relicense changes looks good. Thanks for getting this
> > cleaned up. I think you can push it.
>
> +1
>
> Thank
On 1/3/22 3:08 am, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> This series of relicense changes looks good. Thanks for getting this
> cleaned up. I think you can push it.
+1
Thanks
Chris
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 2/28/2022 12:19, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 26/02/2022 08:03, Kinsey Moore wrote:
On 2/26/2022 00:53, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 26/02/2022 00:41, Kinsey Moore wrote:
This may also be an issue for ARM, RISC-V and others as it doesn't
appear that ARM saves CPSR during context switch and I co
On 26/02/2022 08:03, Kinsey Moore wrote:
On 2/26/2022 00:53, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 26/02/2022 00:41, Kinsey Moore wrote:
This may also be an issue for ARM, RISC-V and others as it doesn't
appear that ARM saves CPSR during context switch and I couldn't tell
that RISC-V does this either, tho
On Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 7:55 PM zack leung wrote:
>
> diff --git a/cpukit/include/rtems/libcsupport.h
> b/cpukit/include/rtems/libcsupport.h
> index f4be4cfc9a..ec385bb71a 100644
> --- a/cpukit/include/rtems/libcsupport.h
> +++ b/cpukit/include/rtems/libcsupport.h
> @@ -73,7 +73,10 @@ extern size
This series of relicense changes looks good. Thanks for getting this
cleaned up. I think you can push it.
On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 5:23 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> This large series of patches is mechanical and almost completely
> generated by a script. I focused on directories where all authors
>
On 2/26/2022 12:50, Gedare Bloom wrote:
this part looks ok
Thanks, I'm going to hold off on committing this part because the
optimization shaved enough time off of task execution that it exposed
the bug described in the other patch which is why they're bundled.
Kinsey
On Fri, Feb 25, 20
