On 23.02.23 19:38, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
On Thu, 23 Feb 2023 03:48:26 PST (-0800),
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de wrote:
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/t-rtems: Keep only -mcmodel=medany 64-bit multilibs.
Add non-compact 32-bit multilibs.
---
gcc/config/riscv/t-rtems | 17 +-
Hi all,
On Thu, Feb 23, 2023 at 4:00 PM Karel Gardas
wrote:
>
> Hi Prakhar,
>
> On 2/23/23 20:23, Prakhar Agrawal wrote:
> > I completely agree with all your points, but my rationale for
> > introducing the jetson nano or jetson AGX orin was because of their GPU
> > power.
>
> it's really nice w
Hi Prakhar,
On 2/23/23 20:23, Prakhar Agrawal wrote:
I completely agree with all your points, but my rationale for
introducing the jetson nano or jetson AGX orin was because of their GPU
power.
it's really nice what Nvidia achieved here, right? Unfortunately this
GPU potential is fully lock
I completely agree with all your points, but my rationale for introducing
the jetson nano or jetson AGX orin was because of their GPU power.
In the case of large hobby projects or maybe the initial days of a
startup(seed ones), a real-time system that can work with boards having
good GPU can do wo
Hello,
On 2023-02-23 06:15, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Wed, Feb 22, 2023, 9:26 PM Prakhar Agrawal
mailto:prakhar.agrawal...@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hello,
Does the current RTEMS version support the Jetson nano board, if
not, do you think It will be a good project for gsoc2023? somethin
gcc/ChangeLog:
* config/riscv/t-rtems: Keep only -mcmodel=medany 64-bit multilibs.
Add non-compact 32-bit multilibs.
---
gcc/config/riscv/t-rtems | 17 +
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/t-rtems b/gcc/config/riscv/t-rte
On Wed, 22 Feb 2023 at 20:48, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> On 22.02.23 16:14, Hesham Almatary wrote:
> > * Remove BSPs with medany name in them (See #4775).
> > RV64 BSPs are now all medany by default.
>
> Do we still need the non-medany 64-bit multilibs in GCC? I plan to
> adjust the multilib selec
