On 11.08.23 07:40, Chris Johns wrote:
On 11/8/2023 3:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 11.08.23 02:21, Chris Johns wrote:
On 10/8/2023 7:02 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Document that the build scripts in the testsuites produce a test program.
I am sorry but I do not understand this change and
On 11/8/2023 3:43 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 11.08.23 07:39, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 11/8/2023 3:37 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 11.08.23 02:22, Chris Johns wrote:
On 10/8/2023 8:19 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> This helps to make the build reproducible.
> ---
>
On 11.08.23 07:39, Chris Johns wrote:
On 11/8/2023 3:37 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 11.08.23 02:22, Chris Johns wrote:
On 10/8/2023 8:19 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
This helps to make the build reproducible.
---
wscript | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
On 11/8/2023 3:33 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 11.08.23 02:21, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 10/8/2023 7:02 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> Document that the build scripts in the testsuites produce a test program.
>> I am sorry but I do not understand this change and why we need it. Is the
>>
On 11/8/2023 3:37 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 11.08.23 02:22, Chris Johns wrote:
>> On 10/8/2023 8:19 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> This helps to make the build reproducible.
>>> ---
>>> wscript | 11 ++-
>>> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git
The BSP needs the CPU_DATA_CACHE_ALIGNMENT set to enable correct cache
handling in libbsd. Otherwise for example USB doesn't work reliable.
---
rtemsbsd/include/machine/rtems-bsd-cache.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/rtemsbsd/include/machine/rtems-bsd-cache.h
Enable the USB modules in the FDT.
---
bsps/arm/imxrt/dts/imxrt1166-cm7-saltshaker.c | 115 +++---
.../imxrt/dts/imxrt1166-cm7-saltshaker.dts| 8 ++
bsps/arm/imxrt/include/imxrt/imxrt1166.dtsi | 8 ++
3 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
diff --git
Adds a driver for the i.MXRT1166 USB PHY and enable USB for the
imxrt11xx BSPs.
---
libbsd.py | 6 +
rtemsbsd/include/bsp/nexus-devices.h | 8 +
.../sys/arm/freescale/imx/imxrt1166_usbphy.c | 227 ++
3 files changed, 241
The nocache-memory was set as device memory. It's not necessary to be
that strict. Set it to normal non-cacheable non-shareable memory
instead.
---
bsps/arm/imxrt/start/mpu-config.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/arm/imxrt/start/mpu-config.c
The mcux-sdk tries to enable the USBPHY. But it uses the wrong register
for that. This patch fixes the bug.
---
.../imxrt/mcux-sdk/devices/MIMXRT1166/drivers/fsl_clock.c | 8
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/bsps/arm/imxrt/mcux-sdk/devices/MIMXRT1166/drivers/fsl_clock.c
Hello,
this patch set adds a USB PHY driver for the i.MXRT11xx family and
enables USB on that device family.
Best regards
Christian
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 11.08.23 02:22, Chris Johns wrote:
On 10/8/2023 8:19 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
This helps to make the build reproducible.
---
wscript | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/wscript b/wscript
index a8fca88dcb..4baf701c27 100755
--- a/wscript
+++
On 11.08.23 02:21, Chris Johns wrote:
On 10/8/2023 7:02 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Document that the build scripts in the testsuites produce a test program.
I am sorry but I do not understand this change and why we need it. Is the
addition of the target line purely cosmetic?
This information
On 11.08.23 00:14, Joel Sherrill wrote:
I should have asked if you want another round of patches or just go
ahead and merge. This set of changes was pretty minor.
This is fine, I had only some cosmetic things.
--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
Germany
On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 8:04 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>
> On 10/8/2023 2:41 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Reading the EPICS discussion, I wonder if this should be added for all
> > motorola_powerpc BSP variants.
> >
> > Gedare/Chris/anyone with another board in the family? What do you think?
>
>
On 10/8/2023 8:19 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> This helps to make the build reproducible.
> ---
> wscript | 11 ++-
> 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/wscript b/wscript
> index a8fca88dcb..4baf701c27 100755
> --- a/wscript
> +++ b/wscript
> @@ -188,6
OK to push
Thanks
Chris
On 10/8/2023 11:52 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Encode the SHA512 digest in base64urlsafe instead of a hex string to
> reduce the report size.
> ---
> tester/rt/test.py | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/tester/rt/test.py
On 10/8/2023 7:02 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Document that the build scripts in the testsuites produce a test program.
I am sorry but I do not understand this change and why we need it. Is the
addition of the target line purely cosmetic?
Chris
___
On 10/8/2023 11:44 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 10.08.23 15:28, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>> It looks ok but why? It isn't built if not supported. It isn't a lot of code
>> even if it is built. And it will not be in a user executable if they don't
>> call it.
>>
>> I just don't see the point.
>
>
On 11/8/2023 8:14 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> I should have asked if you want another round of patches or just go ahead and
> merge. This set of changes was pretty minor.
I am fine with the changes being pushed.
Chris
___
devel mailing list
I should have asked if you want another round of patches or just go ahead
and merge. This set of changes was pretty minor.
--joel
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 5:13 PM Joel Sherrill wrote:
> I think I have addressed all of your comments and Chris'.
>
> The conversion to rtems-central might be nice
I think I have addressed all of your comments and Chris'.
The conversion to rtems-central might be nice but it isn't going to happen
soon.
--joel
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 12:10 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> On 09.08.23 17:42, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Updates
Encode the SHA512 digest in base64urlsafe instead of a hex string to
reduce the report size.
---
tester/rt/test.py | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tester/rt/test.py b/tester/rt/test.py
index 2b5ad85..0e22002 100644
--- a/tester/rt/test.py
+++
On 10.08.23 15:28, Joel Sherrill wrote:
It looks ok but why? It isn't built if not supported. It isn't a lot of
code even if it is built. And it will not be in a user executable if
they don't call it.
I just don't see the point.
Yes, good question. Actually, I wanted to add an option to
It looks ok but why? It isn't built if not supported. It isn't a lot of
code even if it is built. And it will not be in a user executable if they
don't call it.
I just don't see the point.
--joel
On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 6:03 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> ---
---
spec/build/cpukit/optlibdl.yml| 32 +++
spec/build/testsuites/libtests/optrtemsld.yml | 2 +-
.../testsuites/libtests/optrtemssyms.yml | 2 +-
3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --git a/spec/build/cpukit/optlibdl.yml
This helps to make the build reproducible.
---
wscript | 11 ++-
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/wscript b/wscript
index a8fca88dcb..4baf701c27 100755
--- a/wscript
+++ b/wscript
@@ -188,6 +188,15 @@ def process_start_files(self):
Document that the build scripts in the testsuites produce a test program.
---
spec/build/testsuites/libtests/dl01.yml | 1 +
spec/build/testsuites/libtests/dl02.yml | 1 +
spec/build/testsuites/libtests/dl04.yml | 1 +
spec/build/testsuites/libtests/dl05.yml | 1 +
Some build scripts may produce a test program for example.
---
eng/req/items.rst | 5 +
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eng/req/items.rst b/eng/req/items.rst
index 4388c4c..286e998 100644
--- a/eng/req/items.rst
+++ b/eng/req/items.rst
@@ -869,6 +869,9 @@ stlib
The
A gentle reminder for this. Please let me know which changes are required
so that I can send the next set of patches as well.
On Wed, Aug 9, 2023 at 9:20 AM Utkarsh Verma wrote:
> Changes can also be seen on my fork:
> https://github.com/UtkarshVerma/rtems/tree/refactor
>
> On Wed, Aug 9, 2023
On 10/8/2023 3:06 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 10.08.23 03:13, Chris Johns wrote:
>>
>> On 9/8/2023 7:12 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>>> On 09.08.23 11:10, Cedric Berger wrote:
On 09.08.23 10:51, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> We could add some text to the option description:
>
> #
31 matches
Mail list logo
