On 20/12/2023 8:12 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> I tried the patch on Rocky 9 with Python 3.9.14 and sphinx-build 5.3.0 from a
> pip local install.
>
> (rtemsdocs) [joel@localhost rtems-docs]$ ./waf distclean
> Waf: The wscript in '/home/joel/rtems-work/rtems-docs' is unreadable
> Traceback (most
It didn't work on the CentOS 7 system because Chris pushed while I was
switching VMs.
I now get the same output on CentOS 7 as on Rocky 9. It has sphinx-build
5.3.0
--joel
On Tue, Dec 19, 2023 at 3:10 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> Module:rtems-docs
> Branch:master
> Commit:
I tried the patch on Rocky 9 with Python 3.9.14 and sphinx-build 5.3.0
from a pip local install.
(rtemsdocs) [joel@localhost rtems-docs]$ ./waf distclean
Waf: The wscript in '/home/joel/rtems-work/rtems-docs' is unreadable
Traceback (most recent call last):
File
On Thu, Dec 7, 2023 at 12:19 AM Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> it seems we still have no tool and configuration to get satisfying
> results when applied to existing RTEMS source files. May I suggest a
> more pragmatic approach which focuses on new files. Would it be an
> option to simply
lgtm, thanks
On Mon, Dec 18, 2023 at 7:59 PM wrote:
>
> From: Chris Johns
>
> Updates #4695
> ---
> user/exe/initialization.rst| 3 +--
> user/tracing/captureengine.rst | 20 ++--
> user/tracing/examples.rst | 12 ++--
> 3 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 18
On 29.11.23 09:13, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 28.11.23 20:49, andrew.butterfi...@scss.tcd.ie wrote:
+ scenario
+ In a setting that involves many concurrent tasks that
interleave in arbitrary
+ ways, a scenario describes a single specific possible
