Re: [PATCH] improved error checking in ticks per timeslice

Hey i've replied with another patch :) On Tue, 5 Mar 2024 at 10:42, Kinsey Moore wrote: > Zack, > It looks like there's been a little confusion here. Sebastian was > requesting that you condense the pair of #ifs into a single #if with && and > the defined check still coming first. It is mostly t

[PATCH] improved error checking in ticks per timeslice

From: Zack leung diff --git a/cpukit/doxygen/appl-config.h b/cpukit/doxygen/appl-config.h index bd7cde628f..d480eb3971 100644 --- a/cpukit/doxygen/appl-config.h +++ b/cpukit/doxygen/appl-config.h @@ -3312,7 +3312,7 @@ * @parblock * The following constraints apply to this configuration option:

[PATCH rtems-source-builder 1/2] glib: Update to 2.56.4

This updates glib to 2.56.4 for AArch64 build support. --- bare/config/devel/glib-2.56.4-1.cfg| 30 ++ bare/config/devel/qemu-couverture.bset | 2 +- bare/config/devel/qemu-xilinx.bset | 2 +- bare/config/devel/qemu.bset| 2 +- source-builder/config/g

[PATCH rtems-source-builder 2/2] qemu-xilinx: Update to 2023.2

The 2020.2 version of Xilinx's qemu branch does not build on AArch64 due to a merge conflict that was integrated into the repository and never corrected. This brings qemu-xilinx up to 2023.2 to resolve that issue and allow it to build on AArch64 systems. --- bare/config/devel/qemu-xilinx-v2023.2-1

Re: [RFC] generic CAN/CAN FD susbsytem for RTEMS from scratch (LinCAN inspired)

On Thu, Feb 29, 2024 at 6:40 AM Pavel Pisa wrote: > > Hello Gedare > > On Tuesday 27 of February 2024 22:27:43 Gedare Bloom wrote: > > On Mon, Feb 12, 2024 at 8:03 AM Pavel Pisa wrote: > > > Michal Lenc works on a new generic CAN/CAN FD subsystem for RTEMS under > > > my supervision. The project

Re: [PATCH 4/6] build: Add support to make bootloader images

On Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 12:19 AM Chris Johns wrote: > > > > On 1/3/2024 9:57 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 29.02.24 00:05, Chris Johns wrote: > If it is will the details be exported in the pkgconfig file and made > available > for users building applications in a consistent and

Re: Getting started task done

PS: You may add yourself to the table at https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/GSoC/2024#ContributorsProposals On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 2:15 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > Hi Atharv Dubey, > > This is acceptable. However, could you please re-do this to create a > *minimal* patch containing only a small change r

Re: Getting started task done

Hi Atharv Dubey, This is acceptable. However, could you please re-do this to create a *minimal* patch containing only a small change required to modify what the hello sample prints? The patch you sent includes many superfluous changes, including a lot of commented-out lines of code and excessive b

[PATCH] bsps/shared/xqspipsu: Read correct status bits

When resetting the QSPI FIFOs, the driver was reading write-only bits of a register for status information when it was actually in a different register. This corrects the driver so that it reads the correct status bits. --- bsps/shared/dev/spi/xqspipsu.c | 15 +++ 1 file changed, 15 in

[PATCH] bsps/shared/xnandpsu: Add opportunistic page cache

Add an opportunistic page cache to the xnandpsu driver since it does not implement partial page reads and common filesystem access patterns perform multiple reads from the same page. This has been seen to provide a 10x speedup to read speeds and a 2x speedup on first initialization when used with J

Re: [PATCH] improved error checking in ticks per timeslice

Zack, It looks like there's been a little confusion here. Sebastian was requesting that you condense the pair of #ifs into a single #if with && and the defined check still coming first. It is mostly trivial in this instance, but virtually every other example in the related files is of a multi-condi

Fwd: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for RTEMS

-- Forwarded message - From: Date: Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 7:49 PM Subject: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for RTEMS To: Your request for analysis of RTEMS has been completed successfully. The results are available at https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/click?upn=u001.A

Fwd: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for RTEMS-Newlib

-- Forwarded message - From: Date: Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 7:51 PM Subject: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for RTEMS-Newlib To: Your request for analysis of RTEMS-Newlib has been completed successfully. The results are available at https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/cl

Fwd: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for RTEMS-Tools

-- Forwarded message - From: Date: Mon, Mar 4, 2024 at 5:56 PM Subject: Coverity Scan: Analysis completed for RTEMS-Tools To: Your request for analysis of RTEMS-Tools has been completed successfully. The results are available at https://u15810271.ct.sendgrid.net/ls/clic

Coverity Scan Runs Renabled

Hi Coverity required an update of their client tool to keep doing scans. The new client tool was based on a libc library version which was newer than what was on the machine running the scans. This required setting this up again on another computer with a newer OS. I am forwarding three Coverity