[PATCH v3 1/1] tester: Add yaml format to the supported report formats

2020-12-08 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia --- tester/rt/test.py | 116 +- 1 file changed, 114 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tester/rt/test.py b/tester/rt/test.py index 9b157e9..66f1756 100644 --- a/tester/rt/test.py +++ b/tester/rt/test.py @@ -339,9 +339,115

[PATCH v3 0/1] Add yaml format to the supported report formats

2020-12-08 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia Two output formats were supported by RTEMS Tester: json and junit. This patch adds yaml to the list of supported formats. The information being stored in the output file is the same as the one being stored for the other formats, with the addition of adding a few more

[PATCH v2 1/1] tester: Add yaml format to the supported report formats

2020-12-03 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia --- tester/rt/test.py | 115 +- 1 file changed, 113 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tester/rt/test.py b/tester/rt/test.py index 9b157e9..e0cfdff 100644 --- a/tester/rt/test.py +++ b/tester/rt/test.py @@ -339,9 +339,120

[PATCH v2 0/1] Add yaml format to the supported report formats

2020-12-03 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia Two output formats were supported by RTEMS Tester: json and junit. This patch adds yaml to the list of supported formats. The information being stored in the ouput file is the same as the one being stored for the other formats, with the addition of adding a few more

[PATCH 1/1] Add yaml format to the supported report formats

2020-12-02 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia --- tester/rt/test.py | 104 +- 1 file changed, 102 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/tester/rt/test.py b/tester/rt/test.py index 9b157e9..0178a8d 100644 --- a/tester/rt/test.py +++ b/tester/rt/test.py @@ -339,9 +339,109

[PATCH 0/1] Add yaml format to the supported report formats

2020-12-02 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia Two output formats were supported by RTEMS Tester: json and junit. This patch adds yaml to the list of supported formats. The information being stored in the ouput file is the same as the one being stored for the other formats, with the addition of adding a few more

Re: [PATCH 0/1] user/rsb/configuration.rst: Complete review on the text

2020-04-16 Thread clrrm
Dear all, I’ve sent this patch last week but I didn’t receive any feedback on it. Could please someone review the patch? Regards, Cláudio > On 8 Apr 2020, at 17:55, Cláudio Maia (clrrm) wrote: > > From: Cláudio Maia > > This patch proposes several fixes in the rsb/configu

[PATCH 0/5] Proposes fixes for RTEMS Tester documentation page

2020-04-09 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia This set of patches proposes several fixes for RTEMS Tester documentation. Namely: - Text was reviewed and improved for clarity; - References to 'sparc-rtems5-run' command and 'erc32-run' were removed from the documentation page. Now, the example uses 'erc32-sis' instead.

[PATCH 5/5] user/tools/tester.rst: Removes text references to 'erc32-run' and replaces the example with 'erc32-sis'

2020-04-09 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia --- user/tools/tester.rst | 8 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst index 153809f..e00eb0d 100644 --- a/user/tools/tester.rst +++ b/user/tools/tester.rst @@ -61,9 +61,7 @@ You can list the

[PATCH 2/5] user/tools/tester.rst: Removes wrong reference to GDB

2020-04-09 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia --- user/tools/tester.rst | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst index b77240b..c07fc49 100644 --- a/user/tools/tester.rst +++ b/user/tools/tester.rst @@ -259,9 +259,6 @@ You can see your executable running in the

[PATCH 4/5] user/tools/tester.rst: Removes example using 'sparc-rtems5-run'

2020-04-09 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia --- user/tools/tester.rst | 14 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst index 9f9933a..153809f 100644 --- a/user/tools/tester.rst +++ b/user/tools/tester.rst @@ -97,19 +97,7 @@ make finishes,

[PATCH 1/5] user/tools/tester.rst: Cleans up text

2020-04-09 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia --- user/tools/tester.rst | 170 ++ 1 file changed, 90 insertions(+), 80 deletions(-) diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst index e3a21c9..b77240b 100644 --- a/user/tools/tester.rst +++ b/user/tools/tester.rst @@

[PATCH 3/5] user/tools/tester.rst: Clarifies the need of --rtems-tools in rtems-test command line

2020-04-09 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia --- user/tools/tester.rst | 14 -- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst index c07fc49..9f9933a 100644 --- a/user/tools/tester.rst +++ b/user/tools/tester.rst @@ -280,7 +280,6 @@ BSP build tree:

[PATCH 0/1] user/rsb/configuration.rst: Complete review on the text

2020-04-08 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia This patch proposes several fixes in the rsb/configuration.rst file. The document was reviewed from top to bottom with the following modifications being proposed: - moved the paragraph describing the %source directive closer to where the directive is introduced in the text,

[PATCH 1/1] user/rsb/configuration.rst: Complete review on the text

2020-04-08 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia --- user/rsb/configuration.rst | 424 +++-- 1 file changed, 215 insertions(+), 209 deletions(-) diff --git a/user/rsb/configuration.rst b/user/rsb/configuration.rst index 4b21dee..561ae60 100644 --- a/user/rsb/configuration.rst +++

[PATCH 1/1] bsps: Deletes erc32-run.ini

2020-03-22 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia --- tester/rtems/testing/bsps/erc32-run.ini | 38 - 1 file changed, 38 deletions(-) delete mode 100644 tester/rtems/testing/bsps/erc32-run.ini diff --git a/tester/rtems/testing/bsps/erc32-run.ini b/tester/rtems/testing/bsps/erc32-run.ini deleted

[PATCH 0/1] Removes erc32-run.ini from rtems-tools repo

2020-03-22 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia This BSP uses 'sparc-rtems5-run' which is not being generated anymore after compiling the toolchain. Consequently, its execution fails when being used (i.e., when using '--rtems-bsp=erc32-run'). Thus, to make things consistent I propose to remove this file. Cláudio Maia

[PATCH 3/6] user/tools/tester.rst: Clarifies the need of --rtems-tools in rtems-test command line

2020-03-22 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia --- user/tools/tester.rst | 13 +++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst index 96e32ed..32e1ca2 100644 --- a/user/tools/tester.rst +++ b/user/tools/tester.rst @@ -281,7 +281,6 @@ BSP build tree:

[PATCH 6/6] user/tools/tester.rst: Removes text references to 'erc32-run' and replaces the example with 'erc32-sis'

2020-03-22 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia --- user/tools/tester.rst | 12 +--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst index 5147f3d..5548ad9 100644 --- a/user/tools/tester.rst +++ b/user/tools/tester.rst @@ -62,11 +62,9 @@ You can list the

[PATCH 4/6] user/tools/tester.rst: Rephrase last sentence

2020-03-22 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia --- user/tools/tester.rst | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst index 32e1ca2..a95651e 100644 --- a/user/tools/tester.rst +++ b/user/tools/tester.rst @@ -586,6 +586,6 @@ review the available

[PATCH 1/6] user/tools/tester.rst: Cleans up text

2020-03-22 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia --- user/tools/tester.rst | 153 ++ 1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 71 deletions(-) diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst index c3c3fe2..44263da 100644 --- a/user/tools/tester.rst +++ b/user/tools/tester.rst @@

[PATCH 2/6] user/tools/tester.rst: Removes wrong reference to GDB break points

2020-03-22 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia --- user/tools/tester.rst | 3 --- 1 file changed, 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst index 44263da..96e32ed 100644 --- a/user/tools/tester.rst +++ b/user/tools/tester.rst @@ -260,9 +260,6 @@ You can see your executable running in the

[PATCH 5/6] user/tools/tester.rst: Removes example using 'sparc-rtems5-run'

2020-03-22 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia --- user/tools/tester.rst | 14 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/user/tools/tester.rst b/user/tools/tester.rst index a95651e..5147f3d 100644 --- a/user/tools/tester.rst +++ b/user/tools/tester.rst @@ -98,19 +98,7 @@ make finishes,

[PATCH 0/6] Proposes fixes for RTEMS Tester documentation page

2020-03-22 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia This set of patches proposes several fixes for RTEMS Tester documentation. Namely: - Text was reviewed and improved for clarity; - References to 'sparc-rtems5-run' command and 'erc32-run' were removed from the documentation page. Now, the example uses 'erc32-sis' instead.

[PATCH] Fix typo in error message

2020-02-24 Thread clrrm
From: Cláudio Maia --- tester/rtems-test | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/tester/rtems-test b/tester/rtems-test index 3eb5701..520366a 100755 --- a/tester/rtems-test +++ b/tester/rtems-test @@ -39,4 +39,4 @@ elif test -f ${base}/share/rtems/${PYTHON_WRAPPER};

Re: Loading RTEMS applications from u-boot on Raspberry Pi 2

2020-02-20 Thread clrrm
Hi Jan, I tried your solution and it does not work in my case. The following is an example of the output that I get: — U-Boot> fatload mmc 0 0x3000 hello.exe reading hello.exe 3456844 bytes read in 269 ms (12.3 MiB/s) U-Boot> bootelf 0x3000 CACHE: Misaligned

Re: Loading RTEMS applications from u-boot on Raspberry Pi 2

2020-02-20 Thread clrrm
Hi Niteesh, Thank you for your input. Following your suggestion allowed me to boot successfully RTEMS from u-boot. Moreover, I confirm that “-O rtems" does not work for me as well. I have a few questions that I would like to ask you. What exactly is going on when we execute “bootm 0x20 -