Re: [5 DOCS PATCH] waf: Backport from main build fixes

2022-11-10 Thread Chris Johns
On 10/11/22 3:40 pm, Gedare Bloom wrote: > looks fine. i'm not sure where > + "review": ("Gerrit Code Review", > "https://review.rtems.org/;), > came from, but I see it in before too. It came from the initial work Amar did in moving us to the RST format. There is no service provided

Re: [5 DOCS PATCH] waf: Backport from main build fixes

2022-11-09 Thread Gedare Bloom
looks fine. i'm not sure where + "review": ("Gerrit Code Review", "https://review.rtems.org/;), came from, but I see it in before too. On Wed, Nov 9, 2022 at 9:36 PM wrote: > > From: Chris Johns > > Closes #4752 > --- > common/conf.py| 17 ++-- > common/latex.py

[5 DOCS PATCH] waf: Backport from main build fixes

2022-11-09 Thread chrisj
From: Chris Johns Closes #4752 --- common/conf.py| 17 ++-- common/latex.py | 7 +++-- common/rtemsdomain.py | 64 +++ common/version.py | 5 +++- common/waf.py | 20 ++ 5 files changed, 78 insertions(+), 35