On 14.03.23 14:37, padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
On Tue, 2023-03-14 at 13:37 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 14.03.23 13:31,padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 14:11 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 06.03.23 13:00,padmarao.beg...@microchip.com
> On Tue, 2023-03-14 at 13:37 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
> On 14.03.23 13:31, padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
> > Hi Sebastian,
> >
> > > On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 14:11 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 06.03.23 13:00,padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
> > > > > On
On 14.03.23 13:31, padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 14:11 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 06.03.23 13:00,padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 11:19 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 06.03.23
Hi Sebastian,
>On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 14:11 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
>
> On 06.03.23 13:00, padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 11:19 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > >
> > > On 06.03.23 10:24,padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
> > > > Hi Sebastian,
> > >
> On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 14:11 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
> On 06.03.23 13:00, padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
> > > On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 11:19 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > >
> > > On 06.03.23 10:24,padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
> > > > Hi Sebastian,
> > > >
> > > > > On
On 06.03.23 13:00, padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 11:19 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 06.03.23 10:24,padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 09:41 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 06.03.23 09:37,padmarao.beg...@microchip.com
> On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 11:19 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
> On 06.03.23 10:24, padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
> > Hi Sebastian,
> >
> > > On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 09:41 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > >
> > > On 06.03.23 09:37, padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
> > > > > Is
> > > >
On 06.03.23 10:24, padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 09:41 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 06.03.23 09:37, padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
Is
the claim complete message ignored if the interrupt is disabled?
Yes.
Is this an intended and
Hi Sebastian,
> On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 09:41 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
> On 06.03.23 09:37, padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
> > > Is
> > > the claim complete message ignored if the interrupt is disabled?
> > >
> > Yes.
>
> Is this an intended and documented behaviour of the PLIC?
On 06.03.23 09:37, padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
Is
the claim complete message ignored if the interrupt is disabled?
Yes.
Is this an intended and documented behaviour of the PLIC? This is a
hardware bug from my point of view. If we really need a software
workround just for the PLIC
Hi Sebastian,
> On Mon, 2023-03-06 at 08:01 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
> Hello Padmarao,
>
> On 03.03.23 15:55, padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 15:18 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > > On 27.02.23 16:51, Padmarao Begari wrote:
> > > > The
Hello Padmarao,
On 03.03.23 15:55, padmarao.beg...@microchip.com wrote:
On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 15:18 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 27.02.23 16:51, Padmarao Begari wrote:
The interrupt complete should clear with the interrupt
number before disabling the interrupt in the PLIC to
get the next
Hi Sebastian,
> On Thu, 2023-03-02 at 15:18 +0100, Sebastian Huber wrote:
>
>
> On 27.02.23 16:51, Padmarao Begari wrote:
> > The interrupt complete should clear with the interrupt
> > number before disabling the interrupt in the PLIC to
> > get the next interrupt.
>
> Which problem does this
On 27.02.23 16:51, Padmarao Begari wrote:
The interrupt complete should clear with the interrupt
number before disabling the interrupt in the PLIC to
get the next interrupt.
Which problem does this patch address?
--
embedded brains GmbH
Herr Sebastian HUBER
Dornierstr. 4
82178 Puchheim
The interrupt complete should clear with the interrupt
number before disabling the interrupt in the PLIC to
get the next interrupt.
---
bsps/riscv/riscv/irq/irq.c | 4
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
diff --git a/bsps/riscv/riscv/irq/irq.c b/bsps/riscv/riscv/irq/irq.c
index
15 matches
Mail list logo