Re: [PATCH] build: Make BUILD_LIBDL configurable

2023-08-10 Thread Chris Johns
On 10/8/2023 11:44 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 10.08.23 15:28, Joel Sherrill wrote: >> It looks ok but why? It isn't built if not supported. It isn't a lot of code >> even if it is built. And it will not be in a user executable if they don't >> call it. >> >> I just don't see the point. > >

Re: [PATCH] build: Make BUILD_LIBDL configurable

2023-08-10 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 10.08.23 15:28, Joel Sherrill wrote: It looks ok but why? It isn't built if not supported. It isn't a lot of code even if it is built. And it will not be in a user executable if they don't call it. I just don't see the point. Yes, good question. Actually, I wanted to add an option to

Re: [PATCH] build: Make BUILD_LIBDL configurable

2023-08-10 Thread Joel Sherrill
It looks ok but why? It isn't built if not supported. It isn't a lot of code even if it is built. And it will not be in a user executable if they don't call it. I just don't see the point. --joel On Thu, Aug 10, 2023 at 6:03 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > ---

[PATCH] build: Make BUILD_LIBDL configurable

2023-08-10 Thread Sebastian Huber
--- spec/build/cpukit/optlibdl.yml| 32 +++ spec/build/testsuites/libtests/optrtemsld.yml | 2 +- .../testsuites/libtests/optrtemssyms.yml | 2 +- 3 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/spec/build/cpukit/optlibdl.yml