Okay.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 6:39 PM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> In the future try to use git-send-email if you can. Inline patches
> especially this small are much easier to review.
>
> Go ahead and apply.
> -Gedare
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Ben Gras wrote:
>> gah.
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Dec
On 12/15/2014 11:42 AM, Gedare Bloom wrote:
> In the future try to use git-send-email if you can. Inline patches
> especially this small are much easier to review.
The --cover-letter is a nice option when sending a large related batch. :)
> Go ahead and apply.
> -Gedare
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at
In the future try to use git-send-email if you can. Inline patches
especially this small are much easier to review.
Go ahead and apply.
-Gedare
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Ben Gras wrote:
> gah.
>
>
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Ben Gras wrote:
>> The extra includes in console_*.c ar
gah.
On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 1:48 PM, Ben Gras wrote:
> The extra includes in console_*.c are to solve a 'no previous prototype'
> warning.
>
> Solves #2212 in trac.
From 5104e9abb8205394996e060669c4ce05a4d33aaf Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Ben Gras
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 13:35:26 +0100
Subje
The extra includes in console_*.c are to solve a 'no previous prototype'
warning.
Solves #2212 in trac.
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel