On 23/01/18 17:30, Gedare Bloom wrote:
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
There were a lot of other 64-bit target problems. Backporting this patch alone
doesn’t help.
OK. The only target affected is sparc64 anyway, and no one is using it
right now as far as I know.
On Tue, Jan 23, 2018 at 10:41 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> There were a lot of other 64-bit target problems. Backporting this patch
> alone doesn’t help.
>
OK. The only target affected is sparc64 anyway, and no one is using it
right now as far as I know.
> - Gedare Bloom schrieb:
>> Please
There were a lot of other 64-bit target problems. Backporting this patch alone
doesn’t help.
- Gedare Bloom schrieb:
> Please also open tickets for 4.11, 4.10 and apply there.
>
> On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 6:34 AM, Sebastian Huber
> wrote:
> > The RTEMS_BLKIO_SETBLKSIZE IO control expects an
Please also open tickets for 4.11, 4.10 and apply there.
On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 6:34 AM, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
> The RTEMS_BLKIO_SETBLKSIZE IO control expects an uint32_t parameter and
> not a size_t which is 64-bits on 64-bit targets.
>
> Update #3082.
> ---
> cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-b
The RTEMS_BLKIO_SETBLKSIZE IO control expects an uint32_t parameter and
not a size_t which is 64-bits on 64-bit targets.
Update #3082.
---
cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-buffer.c | 2 +-
cpukit/libfs/src/rfs/rtems-rfs-buffer.h | 2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a
