On 21.12.22 12:21, Hesham Almatary wrote:
Would it still be fine to
default all RV64 BSPs to medany (and remove medlow) so that we start
all of RISC-V BSPs at 0x8000? If so I'll submit modified patches
and edit the ticket accordingly.
Yes, this makes sense. It seems that the medlow model
On Mon, 19 Dec 2022 at 16:29, Sebastian Huber
wrote:
>
> Hello Hesham,
>
> On 18/12/2022 15:27, heshamelmat...@gmail.com wrote:
> > From: Hesham Almatary
> >
> > Currently generic RISC-V BSPs (riscv/riscv) that start with rv* and not
> > rv*_medany will start at 0x7000. This adds high
Hello Hesham,
On 18/12/2022 15:27, heshamelmat...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Hesham Almatary
Currently generic RISC-V BSPs (riscv/riscv) that start with rv* and not
rv*_medany will start at 0x7000. This adds high maintenance overhead
and deviates from almost all other RISC-V-based OSes and
From: Hesham Almatary
Currently generic RISC-V BSPs (riscv/riscv) that start with rv* and not
rv*_medany will start at 0x7000. This adds high maintenance overhead
and deviates from almost all other RISC-V-based OSes and baremetal programs
that start at 0x8000. Further, testing now has to
