On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 17:33 -0500, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 9:37 AM Martin Erik Werner
> wrote:
> > On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 15:28 +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > > Are the intentionally unused or is there some bug and the generic cache
> > > manager doesn't use them ac
On Mon, Oct 8, 2018 at 9:37 AM Martin Erik Werner <
martinerikwerner@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 15:28 +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > Are the intentionally unused or is there some bug and the generic cache
> > manager doesn't use them accidentally?
>
> I think that when I adde
On Mon, 2018-10-08 at 15:28 +0200, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> Are the intentionally unused or is there some bug and the generic cache
> manager doesn't use them accidentally?
I think that when I added the range support to the or1k cache helpers I
left the 1-line functions there since I was unaware
Are the intentionally unused or is there some bug and the generic cache
manager doesn't use them accidentally?
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189 47 41-16
Fax : +49 89 189 47 41-09
E-Mail : sebastian.hu...@embedd
---
bsps/or1k/shared/cache/cache.c | 35 ---
1 file changed, 35 deletions(-)
diff --git a/bsps/or1k/shared/cache/cache.c b/bsps/or1k/shared/cache/cache.c
index 55fa54e..e664aec 100644
--- a/bsps/or1k/shared/cache/cache.c
+++ b/bsps/or1k/shared/cache/cache.c
@@ -96,
