Re: [PATCH rtems 03/18] verified that we can compile with MVETH_TESTING and MVETH_DEBUG

2021-03-30 Thread Chris Johns
On 30/3/21 5:58 pm, Till Straumann wrote: > This emailing of patches is too confusing and time-consuming for me. That is a shame, it is the process we have. > The tip of my branch which I submitted as a pull request > (c77e67ef3cbf71e27ac5daa6a4c4b5acb4f4ba0e) > does not #define MVETH_DEBUG. Int

Re: [PATCH rtems 03/18] verified that we can compile with MVETH_TESTING and MVETH_DEBUG

2021-03-29 Thread Chris Johns
On 30/3/21 12:27 pm, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote: > From: till straumann > > Update #4344 > --- > bsps/powerpc/beatnik/net/if_mve/mv643xx_eth.c | 59 +++ > .../beatnik/net/if_mve/mv643xx_eth_bsdnet.c | 1 - > 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/

[PATCH rtems 03/18] verified that we can compile with MVETH_TESTING and MVETH_DEBUG

2021-03-29 Thread Vijay Kumar Banerjee
From: till straumann Update #4344 --- bsps/powerpc/beatnik/net/if_mve/mv643xx_eth.c | 59 +++ .../beatnik/net/if_mve/mv643xx_eth_bsdnet.c | 1 - 2 files changed, 47 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/bsps/powerpc/beatnik/net/if_mve/mv643xx_eth.c b/bsps/powerpc/beatn