Hi,
I am really sorry for sending the wrong patch, the crash happened because of
wrong arguments to memove, bcopy has src first and dest second whereas it
is vice versa in memmove. I had fixed this but had sent the old one.
I am really sorry for the trouble. I'll make sure this doesn't happen agai
Hi all,
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 8:42 AM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>
> alright looks good. Vijay or Christian please confirm and push if
> you're good with it too.
>
ofw01.exe breaks after this patch. This probably needs some more debugging.
If it helps, I'm pasting the error:
```
*** FATAL ***
fatal so
alright looks good. Vijay or Christian please confirm and push if
you're good with it too.
On Wed, May 5, 2021 at 12:52 AM Niteesh G. S. wrote:
>
>
>
> On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 11:23 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
>>
>> Hi Niteesh,
>>
>> This looks good to me. What/how did you test it?
>
> I tested it usi
On Mon, May 3, 2021 at 11:23 PM Gedare Bloom wrote:
> Hi Niteesh,
>
> This looks good to me. What/how did you test it?
>
I tested it using the ofw01 test
https://git.rtems.org/rtems/tree/testsuites/libtests/ofw01/init.c
and read EEPROM using i2c.
> Gedare
>
> On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 6:31 AM G S
Hi Niteesh,
This looks good to me. What/how did you test it?
Gedare
On Sat, May 1, 2021 at 6:31 AM G S Niteesh Babu wrote:
>
> This patch adds asserts to fix coverity defects
> 1) CID 1474437 (Out-of-bounds access)
> 2) CID 1474436 (Out-of-bounds access)
>
> From manual inspection, out of bound
This patch adds asserts to fix coverity defects
1) CID 1474437 (Out-of-bounds access)
2) CID 1474436 (Out-of-bounds access)
>From manual inspection, out of bounds access cannot occur due to
bounds checking but coverity fails to detect the checks.
We are adding asserts as a secondary check.
---
bs
