Re: [PATCH v2] zynqmp: Add support for the CFC-400X

2022-11-10 Thread Padmarao.Begari
Hi Kinsey, > On Thu, 2022-11-10 at 07:55 -0600, Kinsey Moore wrote: > > Hi Padmarao, > More compatibles can be added later if necessary to both the device > tree in RTEMS and the driver in RTEMS-LibBSD, but I don't see the > need for either at the moment since the ethernet portion of the >

Re: [PATCH v2] zynqmp: Add support for the CFC-400X

2022-11-10 Thread Kinsey Moore
Hi Padmarao, More compatibles can be added later if necessary to both the device tree in RTEMS and the driver in RTEMS-LibBSD, but I don't see the need for either at the moment since the ethernet portion of the device tree is intended to be used with RTEMS-LibBSD directly. As far as the driver in

Re: [PATCH v2] zynqmp: Add support for the CFC-400X

2022-11-10 Thread Padmarao.Begari
Hi Kinsey, The ethernet compatible "cdns,gem" is mentioned in the device tree, even I used same for PolarFire SoC BSP but later realised that common compatible for the candence GEM is "cdns,macb" used in U-Boot and Linux. Can we go with compatible "cdns,gem"? or will we update with "cdns,macb"

Re: [PATCH v2] zynqmp: Add support for the CFC-400X

2022-11-08 Thread Chris Johns
Looks good and thank you for sorting out this approach. Thanks Chris On 9/11/2022 8:56 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: This adds a BSP variant for the ZynqMP BSP family to support the Innoflight CFC-400X platform. To properly support the CFC-400X, device trees were added to the ZynqMP platform due to

[PATCH v2] zynqmp: Add support for the CFC-400X

2022-11-08 Thread Kinsey Moore
This adds a BSP variant for the ZynqMP BSP family to support the Innoflight CFC-400X platform. To properly support the CFC-400X, device trees were added to the ZynqMP platform due to both the optional management interface as well as alternate physical configuration of the ethernet interfaces. ---