On 4/4/2024 8:19 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 28.03.24 16:48, Kinsey Moore wrote:
>> This patch set looks good to me. I'd suggest a different file for the versal
>> unless there's a good name that can easily cover both.
>
> The versal BSP doesn't use this driver and seems to have a different
On 28.03.24 16:48, Kinsey Moore wrote:
This patch set looks good to me. I'd suggest a different file for the
versal unless there's a good name that can easily cover both.
The versal BSP doesn't use this driver and seems to have a different
hardware UART interface. It uses a BSP-specific driver
This patch set looks good to me. I'd suggest a different file for the
versal unless there's a good name that can easily cover both.
Kinsey
On Wed, Mar 27, 2024 at 9:26 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 28/3/2024 6:43 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> > This helps to provide a shared implementation of the k
On 28/3/2024 6:43 am, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> This helps to provide a shared implementation of the kernel I/O support.
> ---
> bsps/aarch64/xilinx-zynqmp/console/console.c | 4 +-
> bsps/aarch64/xilinx-zynqmp/include/bsp.h | 2 +
> bsps/arm/xilinx-zynq/console/console-config.c | 5 +-
>
This helps to provide a shared implementation of the kernel I/O support.
---
bsps/aarch64/xilinx-zynqmp/console/console.c | 4 +-
bsps/aarch64/xilinx-zynqmp/include/bsp.h | 2 +
bsps/arm/xilinx-zynq/console/console-config.c | 5 +-
bsps/arm/xilinx-zynq/include/bsp.h| 1 +
...
