On 27/5/2023 2:03 am, martinerikwerner@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, 2023-05-26 at 08:33 +1000, Chris Johns wrote:
On 25/5/2023 6:53 pm, martinerikwerner@gmail.com wrote:
While poking around some more, it seems like there's more places in
this file where assumptions of no vendor in the
On Fri, 2023-05-26 at 08:33 +1000, Chris Johns wrote:
> On 25/5/2023 6:53 pm, martinerikwerner@gmail.com wrote:
> > While poking around some more, it seems like there's more places in
> > this file where assumptions of no vendor in the triplet might come
> > into
> > play (but did not affect
On 25/5/2023 6:53 pm, martinerikwerner@gmail.com wrote:
> While poking around some more, it seems like there's more places in
> this file where assumptions of no vendor in the triplet might come into
> play (but did not affect my use of it), if I'm reading it correctly?:
>
> 227
While poking around some more, it seems like there's more places in
this file where assumptions of no vendor in the triplet might come into
play (but did not affect my use of it), if I'm reading it correctly?:
227 conf.env.ARCH_BSP = '%s/%s' % (arch.split('-')[0], bsp)
232
Looks good and thanks. I have pushed this.
If you would like to submit module update patches for the various repos using
rtems_waf please feel free to do so.
Chris
On 25/5/2023 4:13 am, Martin Erik Werner wrote:
> Rework the splitting of arch and bsp to rely on the last field in the
> arch
Rework the splitting of arch and bsp to rely on the last field in the
arch section starting with "rtems", instead of relying on the arch being
exactly two fields in size.
This makes sure that toolchains with a vendor field in their target
triplet can be used with this build system.
Toolchains
