From: Ryan Libby <rli...@freebsd.org>

s/BIT_NAND/BIT_ANDNOT/, and for CPU and DOMAINSET too.  The actual
implementation is "and not" (or "but not"), i.e. A but not B.
Fortunately this does appear to be what all existing callers want.

Don't supply a NAND (not (A and B)) operation at this time.

Discussed with: jeff
Reviewed by:    cem
Sponsored by:   Dell EMC Isilon
Differential Revision:  https://reviews.freebsd.org/D22791
---
 newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/bitset.h | 4 ++--
 newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/cpuset.h | 8 ++++----
 2 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/bitset.h 
b/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/bitset.h
index 0334939c9..a1fd8b316 100644
--- a/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/bitset.h
+++ b/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/bitset.h
@@ -152,13 +152,13 @@
                (d)->__bits[__i] = (s1)->__bits[__i] & (s2)->__bits[__i];\
 } while (0)
 
-#define        BIT_NAND(_s, d, s) do {                                         
\
+#define        BIT_ANDNOT(_s, d, s) do {                                       
\
        __size_t __i;                                                   \
        for (__i = 0; __i < __bitset_words((_s)); __i++)                \
                (d)->__bits[__i] &= ~(s)->__bits[__i];                  \
 } while (0)
 
-#define        BIT_NAND2(_s, d, s1, s2) do {                                   
\
+#define        BIT_ANDNOT2(_s, d, s1, s2) do {                                 
\
        __size_t __i;                                                   \
        for (__i = 0; __i < __bitset_words((_s)); __i++)                \
                (d)->__bits[__i] = (s1)->__bits[__i] & ~(s2)->__bits[__i];\
diff --git a/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/cpuset.h 
b/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/cpuset.h
index 0d21f77fa..a8af67bac 100644
--- a/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/cpuset.h
+++ b/newlib/libc/sys/rtems/include/sys/cpuset.h
@@ -177,16 +177,16 @@ static __inline void CPU_XOR(cpu_set_t *destset, const 
cpu_set_t *srcset1,
   CPU_XOR_S(sizeof(*destset), destset, srcset1, srcset2);
 }
 
-static __inline void CPU_NAND_S(size_t setsize, cpu_set_t *destset,
+static __inline void CPU_ANDNOT_S(size_t setsize, cpu_set_t *destset,
   const cpu_set_t *srcset1, const cpu_set_t *srcset2)
 {
-  BIT_NAND2(_cpu_set_bits(setsize), destset, srcset1, srcset2);
+  BIT_ANDNOT2(_cpu_set_bits(setsize), destset, srcset1, srcset2);
 }
 
-static __inline void CPU_NAND(cpu_set_t *destset, const cpu_set_t *srcset1,
+static __inline void CPU_ANDNOT(cpu_set_t *destset, const cpu_set_t *srcset1,
   const cpu_set_t *srcset2)
 {
-  CPU_NAND_S(sizeof(*destset), destset, srcset1, srcset2);
+  CPU_ANDNOT_S(sizeof(*destset), destset, srcset1, srcset2);
 }
 
 static __inline int CPU_COUNT_S(size_t setsize, const cpu_set_t *set)
-- 
2.35.3

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Reply via email to