On 11/11/22 6:39 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
> On 10/11/2022 01:30, Chris Johns wrote:
>> The first is the maintenance of embedded the version numbers in the
>> documentation. If we can avoid doing that the work per release or dot release
>> is less.
>
> We could use a simple search and replace
On 10/11/2022 01:30, Chris Johns wrote:
The first is the maintenance of embedded the version numbers in the
documentation. If we can avoid doing that the work per release or dot
release is less.
We could use a simple search and replace for this. Searching for
'rtems[0-9]' shows a couple of
On 9/11/2022 4:28 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
On 09/11/2022 01:35, Chris Johns wrote:
Was this posted for review? I do not remember seeing it?
Yes, on September 12.
Thanks. Sorry, I must have missed it.
There are a number of things that could be improved with this change.
I am sure
On 09/11/2022 01:35, Chris Johns wrote:
Was this posted for review? I do not remember seeing it?
Yes, on September 12.
There are a number of things that could be improved with this change.
I am sure things can be improved, but removing completely out of date
stuff can't be that bad.
Hi,
Was this posted for review? I do not remember seeing it?
There are a number of things that could be improved with this change.
Chris
On 8/11/2022 4:47 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote:
Module:rtems-docs
Branch:master
Commit:31199e3a69d2dbd0a8f360e424fd19f3e9ef66ce
Changeset:
