On Mar 28, 2016 7:25 PM, "Chris Johns" wrote:
>
> On 29/03/2016 11:05, Joel Sherrill wrote:
>>
>>
>> Given the feature flag changes in newlib and some warning fine-tuning in
>> gcc, I think we should bump the tools on the master on the master after
>> the next newlib and pick up a close gcc snapsh
On 29/03/2016 11:05, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Given the feature flag changes in newlib and some warning fine-tuning in
gcc, I think we should bump the tools on the master on the master after
the next newlib and pick up a close gcc snapshot.
Hopefully I can merge the random/srandom patch in the next
Hi
Given the feature flag changes in newlib and some warning fine-tuning in
gcc, I think we should bump the tools on the master on the master after the
next newlib and pick up a close gcc snapshot.
Hopefully I can merge the random/srandom patch in the next day or two and
it be in time.
Thoughts?
