Re: New build system ready for testing

2020-09-16 Thread Chris Johns
On 16/9/20 4:45 pm, Karel Gardas wrote: > Looks great, but on submit attempt I've been welcome by "Akismet says > content is spam" and I guess I solved math exercise well... I am sorry, I have no idea why that would happen. Chris ___ devel mailing list

Re: New build system ready for testing

2020-09-15 Thread Karel Gardas
On 9/16/20 3:16 AM, Chris Johns wrote: > On 15/9/20 5:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: >> On 15/09/2020 09:32, Karel Gardas wrote: >> >>> On 9/15/20 9:28 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: Maybe it is more practical if we add a table to a wiki page in which everyone can add the BSPs which were teste

Re: New build system ready for testing

2020-09-15 Thread Chris Johns
On 16/9/20 12:21 pm, Gedare Bloom wrote: > Can you add a brief explanation of each column? I think I know, but I > don't want to assume. Yes that is a good idea. I will do it now. Chris ___ devel mailing list devel@rtems.org http://lists.rtems.org/mailm

Re: New build system ready for testing

2020-09-15 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Tue, Sep 15, 2020 at 7:16 PM Chris Johns wrote: > > On 15/9/20 5:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > > On 15/09/2020 09:32, Karel Gardas wrote: > > > >> On 9/15/20 9:28 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > >>> Maybe it is more practical if we add a table to a wiki page in which > >>> everyone can add the B

Re: New build system ready for testing

2020-09-15 Thread Chris Johns
On 15/9/20 5:36 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 15/09/2020 09:32, Karel Gardas wrote: > >> On 9/15/20 9:28 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> Maybe it is more practical if we add a table to a wiki page in which >>> everyone can add the BSPs which were tested with the new build system. >> I think this

Re: New build system ready for testing

2020-09-15 Thread Chris Johns
On 16/9/20 2:03 am, Kinsey Moore wrote: > I had assumed that the old build system would be removed when the new build > system got added, but that obviously didn't happen. Will it eventually be > removed after a transition period is over or will they both exist and be > maintained going forward?

RE: New build system ready for testing

2020-09-15 Thread Kinsey Moore
This is great news as the AArch64 work I've been doing was built on your waf branch and now I can rebase on to mainline code. I had assumed that the old build system would be removed when the new build system got added, but that obviously didn't happen. Will it eventually be removed after a tran

Re: New build system ready for testing

2020-09-15 Thread Karel Gardas
On 9/15/20 9:36 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 15/09/2020 09:32, Karel Gardas wrote: > >> On 9/15/20 9:28 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> Maybe it is more practical if we add a table to a wiki page in which >>> everyone can add the BSPs which were tested with the new build system. >> I think this

Re: New build system ready for testing

2020-09-15 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 15/09/2020 09:32, Karel Gardas wrote: On 9/15/20 9:28 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: Maybe it is more practical if we add a table to a wiki page in which everyone can add the BSPs which were tested with the new build system. I think this would be fantastic to have. An alternative would be to ad

Re: New build system ready for testing

2020-09-15 Thread Karel Gardas
On 9/15/20 9:28 AM, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Maybe it is more practical if we add a table to a wiki page in which > everyone can add the BSPs which were tested with the new build system. I think this would be fantastic to have. Thanks, Karel ___ devel m

Re: New build system ready for testing

2020-09-15 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 15/09/2020 09:09, Chris Johns wrote: On 14/9/20 5:07 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: I checked in the new build system today. Now is a good time to test your favourite BSP if it still works. Thank you for this work. It is really great. Do you have any thoughts on how we track which BSPs have be

Re: New build system ready for testing

2020-09-15 Thread Chris Johns
On 14/9/20 5:07 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > I checked in the new build system today. Now is a good time to test your > favourite BSP if it still works. Thank you for this work. It is really great. Do you have any thoughts on how we track which BSPs have been looked at and are OK? What do I nee

Re: New build system ready for testing

2020-09-14 Thread Chris Johns
On 15/9/20 4:31 pm, Sebastian Huber wrote: > On 15/09/2020 00:46, Chris Johns wrote: > >> On 15/9/20 1:18 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: >>> Hello Christian, >>> >>> On 14/09/2020 14:23, Christian Mauderer wrote: Hello Sebastian, I get a linker error when I try to build libbsd for BBB (

Re: New build system ready for testing

2020-09-14 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 15/09/2020 00:46, Chris Johns wrote: On 15/9/20 1:18 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: Hello Christian, On 14/09/2020 14:23, Christian Mauderer wrote: Hello Sebastian, I get a linker error when I try to build libbsd for BBB (with a buildset that builds everything but netipsec): - /home/EB/c

Re: New build system ready for testing

2020-09-14 Thread Chris Johns
On 15/9/20 1:18 am, Sebastian Huber wrote: > Hello Christian, > > On 14/09/2020 14:23, Christian Mauderer wrote: >> Hello Sebastian, >> >> I get a linker error when I try to build libbsd for BBB (with a buildset that >> builds everything but netipsec): >> >> - >> /home/EB/christian_m/Projekte/

Re: New build system ready for testing

2020-09-14 Thread Sebastian Huber
Hello Christian, On 14/09/2020 14:23, Christian Mauderer wrote: Hello Sebastian, I get a linker error when I try to build libbsd for BBB (with a buildset that builds everything but netipsec): - /home/EB/christian_m/Projekte/rtems-bbb/install/rtems/6/lib/gcc/arm-rtems6/10.2.1/../../../../a

Re: New build system ready for testing

2020-09-14 Thread Christian Mauderer
Hello Sebastian, I get a linker error when I try to build libbsd for BBB (with a buildset that builds everything but netipsec): - /home/EB/christian_m/Projekte/rtems-bbb/install/rtems/6/lib/gcc/arm-rtems6/10.2.1/../../../../arm-rtems6/bin/ld: ./libbsd.a(uipc_mbuf.c.20.o): in function `m_unm