On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:45 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>
> On 31/3/21 3:29 pm, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:24 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> >>
> >> OK for 5 the branch.
> >>
> > Thanks. will it be ok for master as well? I have created a cloned
> > ticket for master: #4367.
On 31/3/21 3:29 pm, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:24 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>>
>> OK for 5 the branch.
>>
> Thanks. will it be ok for master as well? I have created a cloned
> ticket for master: #4367.
Master is more complicated because what we have currently does not
Hi Chris,
On Tue, Mar 30, 2021 at 10:24 PM Chris Johns wrote:
>
> OK for 5 the branch.
>
Thanks. will it be ok for master as well? I have created a cloned
ticket for master: #4367.
> It was a really great piece of work by everyone to sort this out. I have
> recently been hit by 4 separate cases
OK for 5 the branch.
It was a really great piece of work by everyone to sort this out. I have
recently been hit by 4 separate cases of this change in gcc10 effecting code.
Thanks
Chris
On 31/3/21 11:19 am, Vijay Kumar Banerjee wrote:
> Close #4366
> ---
> rtems/config/tools/rtems-gdb-9.1-1.cfg
