Re: Revisiting Minimum with Static Allocation

2021-02-11 Thread Chris Johns
On 12/2/21 1:17 am, Joel Sherrill wrote: > > > On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 3:04 AM Sebastian Huber > > > wrote: > > On 10/02/2021 21:36, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:57 AM Joel Sherrill

Re: Revisiting Minimum with Static Allocation

2021-02-11 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Thu, Feb 11, 2021 at 3:04 AM Sebastian Huber < sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote: > On 10/02/2021 21:36, Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > > > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:57 AM Joel Sherrill > > wrote: > > > > Hi > > > > The minimum sample is intended to show

Re: Revisiting Minimum with Static Allocation

2021-02-11 Thread Sebastian Huber
On 10/02/2021 21:36, Gedare Bloom wrote: On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:57 AM Joel Sherrill > wrote: Hi The minimum sample is intended to show how to construct the minimum footprint RTEMS application. I suspect that with Sebastian's recent work on static a

Re: Revisiting Minimum with Static Allocation

2021-02-10 Thread Joel Sherrill
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 2:36 PM Gedare Bloom wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:57 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > >> Hi >> >> The minimum sample is intended to show how to construct the minimum >> footprint RTEMS application. I suspect that with Sebastian's recent work on >> static allocation an

Re: Revisiting Minimum with Static Allocation

2021-02-10 Thread Gedare Bloom
On Wed, Feb 10, 2021 at 10:57 AM Joel Sherrill wrote: > Hi > > The minimum sample is intended to show how to construct the minimum > footprint RTEMS application. I suspect that with Sebastian's recent work on > static allocation and reducing footprint, the minimum sample may be able to > benefit

Revisiting Minimum with Static Allocation

2021-02-10 Thread Joel Sherrill
Hi The minimum sample is intended to show how to construct the minimum footprint RTEMS application. I suspect that with Sebastian's recent work on static allocation and reducing footprint, the minimum sample may be able to benefit from tweaking. I just checked rtl22xx_t and it is < 16K code and 2