On 05/04/2021 17:25, Joel Sherrill wrote:
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 9:51 AM Sebastian Huber
<mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>> wrote:
Hello Joel,
On 04/04/2021 22:19, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> Do you have a list or remember wher
On Mon, Apr 5, 2021 at 9:51 AM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello Joel,
>
> On 04/04/2021 22:19, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > Hi Sebastian,
> >
> > Do you have a list or remember where uncrustify could not match the
> > RTEMS
Hello Joel,
On 04/04/2021 22:19, Joel Sherrill wrote:
Hi Sebastian,
Do you have a list or remember where uncrustify could not match the
RTEMS Coding Style?
my uncrustify had 742 options and I didn't manage do find an option set
which produces the RTEMS Coding Style. I think using options
Hi Sebastian,
Do you have a list or remember where uncrustify could not match the RTEMS
Coding Style?
Thanks.
--joel
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
http://lists.rtems.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
...@embedded-brains.de>>
>> > wrote:
>> > Hello,
>> >
>> > I tried to write a configuration file for Uncrustify which is close to
>> > the RTEMS coding style. This tool has really a lot of options. The
>> > configuration f
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020, 6:03 PM Chris Johns wrote:
> On 15/10/20 5:04 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> > On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 12:11 PM Sebastian Huber
> > sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>>
> > wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I tried to write a con
On 15/10/20 5:04 am, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 12:11 PM Sebastian Huber
> <mailto:sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de>>
> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to write a configuration file for Uncrustify which is close to
> the RTEMS codi
On Wed, Oct 14, 2020 at 12:11 PM Sebastian Huber <
sebastian.hu...@embedded-brains.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to write a configuration file for Uncrustify which is close to
> the RTEMS coding style. This tool has really a lot of options. The
> configuration file has
Hi
There is a link in the Engineering Guide to Uncrustify configuration for
RTEMS. Unfortunately that link into the wiki is dead.
Does anyone have that before I ask Amar about a backup?
It needs a better home. :(
Thanks
--joel
___
devel mailing list
checked uncrustify some year ago it looked like a dead
project. The current Github statistics tell a different story. I think
it would be worth to try it out with the latest version.
--
Sebastian Huber, embedded brains GmbH
Address : Dornierstr. 4, D-82178 Puchheim, Germany
Phone : +49 89 189
I think Sebastian wrote the configuration.
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 9:53 AM Joel Sherrill wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> I had forgotten about this but someone reminded me. I don't know how close
> to correct it is or what's deficient. The wiki blames Gedare for it.
>
>
Hi
I had forgotten about this but someone reminded me. I don't know how close
to correct it is or what's deficient. The wiki blames Gedare for it.
https://devel.rtems.org/attachment/wiki/Developer/Coding/Conventions/rtems.uncrustify
-joel
___
devel
this page is
>> consumed?
>
> If it works maybe we could add such scripts to a rtems-tools.
Yes if it works.
> The last time I
> tried to use uncrustify to get the RTEMS style (some years ago) was not very
> successful. I asked a student this week to try out clang-fo
is it? The page says the configuration can assist.
Should this stay in the wiki? Maybe moved up a level as this page is consumed?
If it works maybe we could add such scripts to a rtems-tools. The last
time I tried to use uncrustify to get the RTEMS style (some years ago)
was not very successful
On 05/12/2018 14:59, Joel Sherrill wrote:
> Current location:
> https://devel.rtems.org/attachment/wiki/Developer/Coding/Conventions/rtems.uncrustify
>
> Any thoughts on a better location? The page is being converted to Rest for the
> SW Eng Handbook.
>
How good is it? The page says the
Hi
Current location:
https://devel.rtems.org/attachment/wiki/Developer/Coding/Conventions/rtems.uncrustify
Any thoughts on a better location? The page is being converted to Rest for
the SW Eng Handbook.
--joel
___
devel mailing list
devel@rtems.org
e: RTEMS cfg of uncrustify
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Sichen Zhao <zsc19940...@outlook.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The rtems cfg file of uncrustify:
>> https://devel.rtems.or
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 11:09 AM, Joel Sherrill <j...@rtems.org> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Sichen Zhao <zsc19940...@outlook.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> The rtems cfg file of uncrustify:
>> https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Devel
On Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:07 AM, Sichen Zhao <zsc19940...@outlook.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The rtems cfg file of uncrustify: https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/
> Developer/Coding/Conventions#Tools
> I feel weird about : there are always space after and before the
> parenthesi
Hi all,
The rtems cfg file of uncrustify:
https://devel.rtems.org/wiki/Developer/Coding/Conventions#Tools
I feel weird about : there are always space after and before the parenthesis.
It seems has conflict with Linux kernel tools checkpatch.pl rule
Best Regards
Sichen Zhao
20 matches
Mail list logo
