[seL4] Re: Question on TCB without SC in receiveSignal

2023-12-05 Thread chenpingyuan--- via Devel
OK, thanks Indan. ___ Devel mailing list -- devel@sel4.systems To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@sel4.systems

[seL4] Re: Question on TCB without SC in receiveSignal

2023-12-05 Thread Indan Zupancic
Hello, On 2023-12-05 11:40, chenpingyuan--- via Devel wrote: Thanks Indan for your detail reply. By ready queue, I did mean the scheduling queue since the code named it as ksReadyQueues. Oh, good, I wasn't sure any more. For threads unbound from a SC, this thread will be removed from both

[seL4] Re: Question on TCB without SC in receiveSignal

2023-12-05 Thread chenpingyuan--- via Devel
Thanks Indan for your detail reply. By ready queue, I did mean the scheduling queue since the code named it as ksReadyQueues. For threads unbound from a SC, this thread will be removed from both ksReadyQueues and ksReleaseHead according the code below: void schedContext_unbindTCB(sched_context_t

[seL4] Re: Question on TCB without SC in receiveSignal

2023-12-05 Thread Indan Zupancic
Hello, On 2023-12-05 01:47, chenpingyuan--- via Devel wrote: By saying " threads that are blocked waiting in an endpoint or notification queue will remain in the queue and can still recieve messages and signals.", does it mean that those threads blocked waiting in an endpoint or notification q