Hi,
I've been running S3's Savage driver (version 1.1.18 S3) for the last
few days. I've been using a somewhat hackish setup, using
- the 2D driver within a current CVS HEAD server;
- the kernel module built from 4.2.0 sources and a heavily patched
2.4.18 kernel;
- the 3D driver built from
TR> Unfortunately, "interesting" and "meaningful" are NOT among the
TR> criteria used by the US Patent and Trademark Office in awarding
TR> patents.
The European Parliament intends to discuss in September Arlene
McCarthy's bill that aims to put European patent law in step with its
American counter
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 06:09:44PM -0700, Mark Vojkovich wrote:
>Ironically, the Linux desktop community doesn't target the
> only potential business case there is. It's often at odds with
> it. Workstation users like a platform that doesn't change and anything
> that risks damaging OpenGL b
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Tim Roberts wrote:
> On 18 Jul 2003 20:16:35 -0500, William Suetholz wrote:
> >
> >On the other hand.. If more people who didn't want to have to run
> >another OS to access features that are not well supported because of
> >lack of knowledge on how to support them would comm
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Torrey Lyons wrote:
> Jaguar (Mac OS X 10.2.x) has IPv6 support but does not define
> socklen_t. This type is required by Xserver/os/xdmcp.c with IPv6
> support:
> #if defined(IPv6) && defined(AF_INET6)
> static struct addrinfo *mgrAddr;
> static struct addrinfo *mgrAddrFirs
On 18 Jul 2003 20:16:35 -0500, William Suetholz wrote:
>
>On the other hand.. If more people who didn't want to have to run
>another OS to access features that are not well supported because of
>lack of knowledge on how to support them would comment/complain
>(oh alright -BITCH-) maybe the hardw
Jaguar (Mac OS X 10.2.x) has IPv6 support but does not define
socklen_t. This type is required by Xserver/os/xdmcp.c with IPv6
support:
#if defined(IPv6) && defined(AF_INET6)
static struct addrinfo *mgrAddr;
static struct addrinfo *mgrAddrFirst;
#define SOCKADDR_TYPE struct sockaddr_s
Hello,
Thank you all on the list for your responses.. It has been
interesting.
Mr. Harris, yes I am one of "Those people" who want a device to work
in my chosen operating system, and have been frustrated that while
things have gotten a bit better than they were in 1998, the OS and users
that
Hi,
I use twm and have to put initial window of mozilla into 0,0 position.
But there's a bug in mozilla - it ignores geometry setting - this bug is
filed but still not fixed.
I did not find any means to set x,y in twm, so the question is whether
there is a way to set geometry of window with some
You're the first person I've seen in the Linux world who actually
has some insight into the way this really works. Not to say that
what you've said is all there is too it. It's not a simple
as that, but there is certainly this aspect to it, and it's
possibly the dominant one.
Frank La Monic
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003 12:25:16 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
>
>Maybe they could have the whole X driver and kernel module in open
>source, and only keep the opengl library as proprietary stuff. I more or
>less doubt they have any IP involved in these part, at least some really
>meaningfull stuff.
Unfor
Cynthia Grossen has helped me to get a Wiki for XFree86-related
topics started. You can find it under:
http://xfree86.linuxwiki.org
In fact this Wiki has been around for over a year now, but
it has never been announced publically. Since it has been
moved to the linuxwiki.org domain I w
Mike A. Harris wrote:
On 17 Jul 2003, William Suetholz wrote:
After all their drivers don't support XV at all, so you can't
use the multimedia capabilities of some of their integrated
cards like the AIW-PRO and 8500DV. I realize that in the past
they have provided some information to XFree86
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 05:57:50AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> > >What's the deal with ATI's drivers?
> >
>
> Maybe they could have the whole X driver and kernel module in open
> source, and only keep the opengl library as proprietary stuff. I more or
>
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> On 17 Jul 2003, William Suetholz wrote:
>
> If I sound like the devil's advocate, I assure you I'm not. I'm
> just tired of hearing random people bitch and beak off about this
> type of crap who don't put any sort of thought whatsoever into
> the busin
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 12:44:46PM +0200, Peter Firefly Lund wrote:
> On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
>
> > > Why do these companies not open source their complete drivers?
> > > Because they have intellectual property in their drivers that
> >
> > As if their concurent where not capable o
On Fri, 18 Jul 2003, Sven Luther wrote:
> > Why do these companies not open source their complete drivers?
> > Because they have intellectual property in their drivers that
>
> As if their concurent where not capable of reverse engineering the
^
competition
somehow English c
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 05:57:50AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> >What's the deal with ATI's drivers?
>
> The binary ones, or the open source ones? Either way, your
> question isn't very clear. "What's the deal" doesn't mean a lot.
I think you are exagerating, it was perfectly clear what he d
On 17 Jul 2003, William Suetholz wrote:
> When are the various different patches out there for ATI cards going
>to be integrated into XFree86 and DRI? I know of at least two different
>projects that are modifying these drivers.
I'm not sure what specific patches you're refering to, but
if you
19 matches
Mail list logo
