try removing the videoram line from your config. the driver will
detect videoram fine.
Alex
--- Salvio Sergi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I posted this on dri-users and have been suggested to post here...
>
> Everything starts fine with no errors (as you can see from the logs).
>
> Th
On Fri, 7 Nov 2003, Mike A. Harris wrote:
> Everywhere
> in the driver hex values are given premultiplied by 4 it seems,
> and specified as VALUE/4.
The register pointers are dword pointers. The register offsets
are byte offsets. They are written as VALUE/4 so that I can grep
for VALUE. T
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 04:39:43PM -, jassi brar wrote:
>Hi all,
>I m building kdrive/Xfbdev,Xipaq (XFree86-4.3.99.14) server. I just amaze why its
>size is so big(Xfbdev-3.2MB, Xipaq-3.3MB)... when it is supposed to be light-weight.
Does your target platform have shared libraries? I find X
On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 07:48:35PM -0600, Boris wrote:
>The latest fontconfig in cvs is old and has problems. After reading posts in reguard
>to the fontconfig in cvs, It has problems with some truetype fonts and fc-cache
>segmentation faults during startup on systems. Fontconfig in cvs is 1.0.2
I'm curious about some of the obscurity in the "nv" driver. In
particular, almost everywhere in the driver, registers are
addressed numerically, and not by symbolic names. That on it's
own is obscure enough to make things difficult to tell what's
going on, but we know the deal with Nvidia doc
The latest fontconfig in cvs is old and has
problems. After reading posts in reguard to the fontconfig in cvs, It has
problems with some truetype fonts and fc-cache segmentation faults during
startup on systems. Fontconfig in cvs is 1.0.2 while the latest is 2.2.0. Could
we please update fon
Hi,
I posted this on dri-users and have been suggested to post here...
Everything starts fine with no errors (as you can see from the logs).
The problem I have is that I don't think I have 2D acceleration.
The simple test I do is to just drag a window on the screen... the
redraw is extremely sl
I've just committed fixes to make the initial viewport behaviour match
the documented behaviour. This affects the initial viewport position
when the initial physical screen resolution is different from the virtual
resolution. The documented behaviour (from XF86Config(5)) is:
ViewPort x0
On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 12:27:44PM -0500, David Dawes wrote:
>On Thu, Nov 06, 2003 at 10:28:37AM -0600, Boris wrote:
>>It seems the fontconfig in cvs is very old (1.0.2) and needs to be upgraded to
>>2.2.0. Reading varios emails and posts, it seems the older fontconfig has problems
>>with some Tr
Hi all,
I m building kdrive/Xfbdev,Xipaq (XFree86-4.3.99.14) server. I just amaze why its size
is so big(Xfbdev-3.2MB, Xipaq-3.3MB)... when it is supposed to be light-weight.
here are my host.def and cross.def file.
host.def
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Alexander Stohr writes:
> Hello,
>
> i stumbled across the above mentioned define and
> related code in the XFree86 sources (lnx_video.c).
>
> comparing X4.1.0 and X4.3.0 i found that the
> condtitnal coding of "if (base % size)" has
> vanished at some point in time and the handling
> is
Hello All,
My apologies, if this is not the forum to
ask this question. I created a window using
XCreateWindow and set attributes.event_mask to
ButtonReleaseMask alone. But the window is not
receiving the ButtonRelease events. It is receiving
the ButtonRelease event, if ButtonPressMask is
On Thu, 6 Nov 2003, Boris wrote:
>Date: Thu, 6 Nov 2003 10:28:37 -0600
>From: Boris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Content-Type: multipart/alternative;
> boundary="=_NextPart_000_0005_01C3A450.BD38C8A0"
>Subject: Upgrade fontconfig in cvs.
>
>It
14 matches
Mail list logo
