you will lose 10 pounds in 12 days guaranteed with procitravin. Chemical
free, epherda free with no shakes or jitters. Natural weight loss
guaranteed to work or your money back!
http://www.procitravin.com/index11.html
protectorate :)yxvfpfsl k
ae jkht
mcpn
I was messing around with the Debian packages a that are in the 4.3.0 Debian
packages and trying to apply them to 4.3.901. I came across one that
applied that I thought was already done. Does DPMS on ati radeon work in
the 4.3.901? I could not find the bug in bugzilla that used to be
associated wit
Hello.
There have been some recent fixes to a couple of via problem that has not
gone into CVS. More specifically
Bugzilla 525 patches 770 & 857
Bugzilla 945
These patches have been tested and discussed quite extensively on the
viaarena forums and seem to work well.
Would be good to have them i
Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> > Is anyone else seeing the problem that Mozilla now renders glyphs in
> > iso10646-1 fonts which are not assigned (normally Mozilla "scans"
> > iso10646-1 encoded fonts for valid glyphs via looking at non-zero width
> > metrics and puts those glyphs into it's interna
This changes the configuration, only for Debian, such that the manpages end
up in the right places with the right names. I would be wonderful if this
could be committed so this happens automatically for people compiling on
Debian.
Also, is there any chance of that documentation patch I put on the
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Andriy Rysin wrote:
> Just tried 4.3.99.901 (4.4.0 RC 1) and found that ATI Mach64 on my Sony
> Laptop refuses to load X no matter whether I try it with old config
> file, without it or newly created with XFree86 -configure
Looks like I have an off-by-one error there. Please
On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Roland Mainz wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>
> Is anyone else seeing the problem that Mozilla now renders glyphs in
> iso10646-1 fonts which are not assigned (normally Mozilla "scans"
> iso10646-1 encoded fonts for valid glyphs via looking at non-zero width
> metrics and puts those
Roland Mainz wrote:
> Is anyone else seeing the problem that Mozilla now renders glyphs in
> iso10646-1 fonts which are not assigned (normally Mozilla "scans"
> iso10646-1 encoded fonts for valid glyphs via looking at non-zero width
> metrics and puts those glyphs into it's internal CCMap), e.g. th
Hi!
Is anyone else seeing the problem that Mozilla now renders glyphs in
iso10646-1 fonts which are not assigned (normally Mozilla "scans"
iso10646-1 encoded fonts for valid glyphs via looking at non-zero width
metrics and puts those glyphs into it's internal CCMap), e.g. the glyph
0 is rend
Just tried 4.3.99.901 (4.4.0 RC 1) and found that ATI Mach64 on my Sony
Laptop refuses to load X no matter whether I try it with old config
file, without it or newly created with XFree86 -configure
_XSERVTransSocketOpenCOTSServer: Unable to open socket for inet6
_XSERVTransOpen: transport open f
10 matches
Mail list logo