Hi. This is the qmail-send program at .
I'm afraid I wasn't able to deliver your message to the following addresses.
This is a permanent error; I've given up. Sorry it didn't work out.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
This address no longer accepts mail.
--- Below this line is a copy of the message.
On Thu, 5 Feb 2004, [iso-8859-1] Suresh Chandra Mannava wrote:
Does XFree86 need kernel framebuffer support? Or it's
have its own framebuffer interface?
what will be the performance gain if we use kernel
framebuffer support?
If we use a particular server for example Mach64
server, it
Build your own unique super-targeted extremely responsive email list from a massive
international database.
Get the perfect list for as little as $99
Call us today to find out more: 1-866-662-3388
Or reply to this email with the subject send more info.
World Data Corporation
Sun Towers
What is probably needed is a property on the root window that
both apps pay attention to, sort of like a mutex. The first one
to get there sets it and the other honors this request.
In the case of xlock, you have a problem since the purpose is to
lock the screen. I would think that you would
Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
XFree86 does not in general need kernel framebuffer support for
hardware which is supported by an XFree86 driver, as it has its own
framebuffer interface.
There are two cases where XFree86 does need kernel support.
* Chipsets like the i810/i815/i835/... family have no
Building on FreeBSD/Alpha version 5.2 with gcc 3.3.3:
In building the world from a Wednesday morning CVS update, g_render.c
in xc/programs/Xserver/GL/glx failed to compile. The root problem
was a missing right paren, fixed by the patch included below.
Terry R. Friedrichsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 11:21:32AM -0700, Terry R. Friedrichsen wrote:
Building on FreeBSD/Alpha version 5.2 with gcc 3.3.3:
In building the world from a Wednesday morning CVS update, g_render.c
in xc/programs/Xserver/GL/glx failed to compile. The root problem
was a missing right paren,
Hi all ;),
I got an X crash with X 4.3.0, here is the error log.
By the way, are there many bugfixes in the i830 driver for the upcoming
4.4.0 release? Maybe i'm asking for a problem already fixed in CVS...
Gtk-CRITICAL **: file gtkmain.c: line 582 (gtk_main_quit): assertion `main_loops !=
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 08:57:47PM +0100, David Gómez wrote:
Hi all ;),
I got an X crash with X 4.3.0, here is the error log.
By the way, are there many bugfixes in the i830 driver for the upcoming
4.4.0 release? Maybe i'm asking for a problem already fixed in CVS...
You should try it as
On Thu, Feb 05, 2004 at 06:34:42AM +, Suresh Chandra Mannava wrote:
Does XFree86 need kernel framebuffer support? Or it's
have its own framebuffer interface?
It can use the kernel's framebuffer if available, else a VBE 2.0 linear
frame buffer can be utilized with no necessary kernel
Mike A. Harris wrote:
On Tue, 3 Feb 2004, Knut J Bjuland wrote:
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 15:52:53 +0100
From: Knut J Bjuland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed
Subject: Re: Manufacturers who fully
Tim Roberts wrote:
Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
XFree86 does not in general need kernel framebuffer support for
hardware which is supported by an XFree86 driver, as it has its own
framebuffer interface.
There are two cases where XFree86 does need kernel support.
* Chipsets like the
My xmodmap (Apple 1.0) has the strange feature that Shift+Meta_R
behaves the same as Shift+Insert. Here's my xmodmap, that's the best
thing I can think of to send as documentation, but please let me
know if you have any questions (or suggestions).
! .kinesis.bigpuppy an Xmodmap file geared
Andreas Stenglein wrote:
Am 2004.02.04 21:00:14 +0100 schrieb(en) Brian Paul:
Ian Romanick wrote:
[snip]
Making that change and changing the server-side to not advertise a core
version that it can't take protocol for would fix the bug for 4.4.0. Do
you think anything should be done to
14 matches
Mail list logo
