On Fri, Feb 27, 2004 at 11:06:49AM -0500, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
On Fri, 2004-02-27 at 08:20, Juliusz Chroboczek wrote:
JL Is there any plans on writing drivers using the [Linux] event
JL interface
It's most definitely a good idea. The event interface allows access
to additionnal
Hello all!
I need some help...
I started reading the kbd.c file because I'm writing a driver.
There are a lot of function calls in it which start with xf86 but
I don't know where I can find documentation about these functions.
Without knowing exactly what these functions it's pretty hard to
I am very pleased to announce the release of XFree86 4.4.0. This release
comes almost exactly one year after the 4.3.0 release, and is the product
of the work of dedicated volunteers working through a changing and
challenging political environment. I would like to thank all who have
contributed
Matthieu Herrb writes:
Hi,
While working on OpenBSD/amd64 support for XFree86, I found out that the
C preprocessor symbol for AMD64 machines was changed from __x86_64__ to
__AMD64__. But looking at what gcc defines on different AMD63 systems
(*BSD, Linux), it looks __AMD64__ is
fwd: save gasoline
This amazing, revolutionary device Increases Gas
Mileage 27%+ by helping fuel burn better using
three patented processes from General Motors.
Just snap this amazing Fuel saving device over
your fuel supply line and it will begin working
immediately!
http://www.tlna.biz?axel=53
On Sat, 28 Feb 2004, Torrey Lyons wrote:
At 7:17 PM -0800 2/28/04, Matthew Bogosian wrote:
...
I'd like to ask a question, though: is it even conceivably possible to
use the binary code distributed with OS X 10.x in Linux? What I mean
is, is it possible that one could (in theory) write a wrapper
