ve X11 applications in
a windows which mostly work like normal Mac OS X windows.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://zhadum.org.uk/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
e memory in
the first 4GB for loading modules inside the X11 server.
Is the difference between the new and the old malloc() in FreeBSD perhaps
that it now returns address above 4GB?
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.d
On Mon, Nov 28, 2005 at 03:56:57PM +0530, krish ritik wrote:
> I want to learn how to write display drivers for Linux.
Any reason you don't want to write portable display drivers which work
under Linux, *BSD and all the other platforms supported by XFree86?
Kind regards
--
mage() for that purpose.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
hed is what
> I'm ending up with.
Thanks. I've committed it to the NetBSD repository.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
n the patch is ready because I would
like to integrate into the NetBSD sources afterwards.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@XFree86.Org
http://XFree
URLs:
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-2495
http://secunia.com/advisories/16777/
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=594
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
.g. use a notebook as X11 server and
suspend it. Without such a change the X11 clients will survive, with
the change they'll be killed.
The best solution is probably to make that optional.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://schele
privileged
> program to start with?
Maybe a web browser?
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hello,
this should probably be fixed in the XFree86 repository before the 4.5.0
release:
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CAN-2005-0605
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias
release already available somewhere?
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
Devel mailing list
Devel@XFree86.Org
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ebuffer pages now "point to" the physical memory on
> the backup card. For the linux text console, I just call
> redraw_screen() and it repaints the text from Linux's backing
> store. Any advice would be appreciated.
Have a look at the source of the "xrefre
into 4.4.0 ever tested
successfully on another platform than Linux-i386?
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, Mar 07, 2004 at 08:01:10PM +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> Yes. Several OpenBSD users found that too. The attached diff fixes it.
Yes, it does. Thank you very much.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matth
oblem?
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
s.
So may I ask what is the reason that these libraries are not built shared?
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
quot;includes :: ucs2any" to "xc/fonts/util/Imakefile".
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
gs
> from -current builds on OpenBSD.
I've checked the logs again and found that I was apparently wrong. While
you can find some "ucs2any" command multiple times in the logfile they
are executed in different directories. I'm sorry for the false report.
Kind regards
--
ures because
it increases the build time significantly.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Jul 24, 2003 at 04:30:47PM +0100, Dr Andrew C Aitchison wrote:
> Which operating systems are shipping with IPv6 enabled by default ?
NetBSD has IPv6 enable by default, Solaris hasn't.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~
milar to the one described
by Andrew Aitchison.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
re the error. */
... of this.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
tion was to revert to
using a single socket on all platforms and use the above code to enable
accepting IPv4 connections on *BSD.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, Jul 22, 2003 at 09:14:08PM +0200, Egbert Eich wrote:
> As I tried to explain binding to an IPv6 socket implicitely binds to
> an IPv4 socket.
That's a bug.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.d
tialization was successful, everything works:
> I can connect thru IPv6 and IPv4.
This sounds like a bug in Linux's socket implementation. It should allow
an IPv4 and an IPv6 socket to bind to the same port number. This is a
common programming pratice for *BSD or
f,
sizeof (off)) < 0) {
/* error handling */
[...]
}
[...]
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, Jun 12, 2003 at 09:44:28PM +0200, Matthias Scheler wrote:
> The "ucs2any.c" mentioned in this thread is now pure ANSI C, too, and
> passes a full XFree86 build. Once I've done something on the generated
> files I'll commit it to the NetBSD sources for ge
general exposure.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
nt, asprintf(3), etc.)
- It crashes when used as a replacement for "ucs2any.pl" in a full build.
I'm in the process of sorting these issue out with the author and will
submit the program via "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" once the problems are fixed.
Kind regards
--
Ma
On Sun, Mar 30, 2003 at 03:19:14PM -0800, Frank Liu wrote:
> Apparently the libexpat that is included with my OS ...
That's your problem. XFree86 should use the bundled "libexpat". Try to
find out why that doesn't work instead of patching XFree86 sources.
Kin
Hello,
IIRC cross building is one of new features of XFree86 4.3.0. Is there
documentation how to use it?
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL
his ...
#if SystemV4 || (defined(HasShadowPasswd) && HasShadowPasswd)
PWD_DEFINES = -DUSESHADOW
#endif
> ... it should really have a default provided in X11.tmpl.
... unless this gets fixed.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/
| HasShadowPasswd
PWD_DEFINES = -DUSESHADOW
#endif
Just these checks be fixed or should a default be provided?
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
the background,
The best approach is of course just to terminate the X11 server. But you
must *not* use SIGKILL which would leave the console in a garbled state.
Use SIGTERM instead.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler ht
in regular intervals. When that works
you optimize the SunRay display update step by step.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.
e
that is signed cryptographically you will probably get stuck at that point.
Kind regards
--
Matthias Scheler http://scheler.de/~matthias/
___
Devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://XFree86.Org/mailman/listinfo/devel
36 matches
Mail list logo
