On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, georgina o. economou wrote:
> Thanks though for the notice. I'm cc'ing Stuart as he may not know.
Sorry about that. Apache fell over this morning, but it's back now.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bugzilla has been upgraded to the latest version, 2.17.6. The upgrade went
smoothly and everything seems fine so far, but if anyone notices any problems,
please just drop me a note.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Network &
On Fri, 21 Nov 2003, Georgina Economou wrote:
> I noticed today this notice. Does this matter to us as we are 2.17.4 or
> not? And if so, who takes care of this?
I still take careof the bugzilla. I'll look into this, and probably schedule
an update if there is need for security reason,s or the
On Wed, 22 Oct 2003, Harold L Hunt II wrote:
> Where? I see nothing here:
>
> http://xfree86.org/lists.html
>
> I also get nothing when I try to forge a link to the list:
>
> http://www.xfree86.org/mailman/listinfo/developer/
>
>
> Is there a different mailing list server for bugs.xfree86.org?
Y
On Tue, 3 Jun 2003, Aidan Kehoe wrote:
> Okay, I'm a long way from being a Perl expert, but I can try; what version
> of Bugzilla is being used on that machine? Was it installed as a Debian
> package, or by hand?
As the Debian package.
Stuart
Stuart R. Anderson
On Thu, 27 Mar 2003, Kendall Bennett wrote:
> I would be happy to make updates to the BUILD file and submit the
> improvements back (who would I submit my patches to?).
Please use the bugzilla at http://bugs.xfree86.org.
> Finally some of the issues I have had are simply that the good
> document
On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> On a related matter, in libGLU's mysetjmp.h, there is
>
> inline int
> mysetjmp( JumpBuffer *j )
> {
> return ::setjmp( j->buf );
> }
>
> ... and something similar for longjmp(). Now my (spoken) C++ is less than
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Keith Packard wrote:
> Yes, they are rather system specific, but FreeType2 uses setjmp and longjmp
> extensively for error recovery. Disallowing setjmp and longjmp would
> make using FreeType2 rather difficult.
>
> I believe the approach taken will at least work in the majori
On Wed, 19 Feb 2003, Keith Packard wrote:
> Here's a patch which has applications call the real setjmp/longjmp
> directly (and makes xf86jmp_buf larger than jmp_buf). Testing would be
> greatly appreciated.
This approach strikes me as being inherently non-portable wrt the module ABI.
setjmp/long
On Thu, 30 Jan 2003, Alexander Stohr wrote:
> > From CVS/XFree86/xc/extras/Mesa/bin/Attic/glx86asm.py,v
> >
> really? hmm, if the respective API listing ever changes or extends
> it might be simpler to use an existing script and then submitting the
> results
> than to perform error prone copy and
10 matches
Mail list logo
