Matrox I2C patch

2004-06-12 Thread Ryan Underwood
I have two bugs open on the mga driver that I'd like some feedback on: http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1098 This one implements I2C support for G-series cards with single-chip dualhead support. (i.e. not G200 MMS) The purpose is to talk to the MGA-TVO (Maven) chip which controls everyth

Re: Matrox I2C patch

2004-06-12 Thread Andrew C Aitchison
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Ryan Underwood wrote: > > I have two bugs open on the mga driver that I'd like some feedback on: > > http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1098 bugs.xfree86.org seems to be down right now, but I've dug out my G400DH and will try this outr when it comes back online. > This

Re: Matrox I2C patch

2004-06-12 Thread Alex Deucher
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004 05:06:25 -0500, Ryan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > I have two bugs open on the mga driver that I'd like some feedback on: > > http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1098 > > This one implements I2C support for G-series cards with single-chip > dualhead support.

Re: Matrox I2C patch

2004-06-12 Thread Andrew C Aitchison
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Ryan Underwood wrote: > > I have two bugs open on the mga driver that I'd like some feedback on: > > http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1098 mga_maven.h seems to be missing from http://bugs.xfree86.org/attachment.cgi?id=1236&action=view Can I use http:

Re: Matrox I2C patch

2004-06-12 Thread Ryan Underwood
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 12:32:31PM +0100, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: > > I've got a dvi monitor and a VGA monitor on my G550 at work. > What should I be checking out ? Last time I looked DDC only worked on > the first head :-). Well, first of all see if my current mods are working on your G400-DH

Re: Matrox I2C patch

2004-06-12 Thread Ryan Underwood
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 06:35:21PM +0100, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: > On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Ryan Underwood wrote: > > > > > I have two bugs open on the mga driver that I'd like some feedback on: > > > > http://bugs.xfree86.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1098 > > mga_maven.h seems to be missing from >

Re: Matrox I2C patch

2004-06-13 Thread Ryan Underwood
On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 12:11:48PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > I can help with the DVI stuff. I have a G550. What's the port configuration on it? I have a nagging curiosity that the G450 may be able to swap the DAC<->connector mapping like the G550 can. But it only seems that this swap wou

Re: Matrox I2C patch

2004-06-13 Thread Andrew C Aitchison
On Sat, 12 Jun 2004, Ryan Underwood wrote: > > Can I use > > http://bugs.xfree86.org/attachment.cgi?id=1003&action=view > > instead ? > > Right, I should have named that file better. Fixed. OK. I'm using that mga_maven.h file. I'm using XFree86 cvs, and had to comment out the line if (!p

Re: Matrox I2C patch

2004-06-13 Thread Ryan Underwood
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 10:43:03AM +0100, Andrew C Aitchison wrote: > > OK. I'm using that mga_maven.h file. > I'm using XFree86 cvs, and had to comment out the line > if (!pMga->Maven_Bus->I2CStart(pMga->Maven_Bus, pMga->Maven->ByteTimeout)) return > FALSE; > since I2CStart isn't in the _I2C

Re: Matrox I2C patch

2004-06-13 Thread Alex Deucher
On Sun, 13 Jun 2004 03:34:33 -0500, Ryan Underwood <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Sat, Jun 12, 2004 at 12:11:48PM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > > > I can help with the DVI stuff. I have a G550. > > What's the port configuration on it? I have a nagging curiosity that > the G450 may be abl

Re: Matrox I2C patch

2004-06-13 Thread Ryan Underwood
On Sun, Jun 13, 2004 at 11:16:48AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote: > > It's got a DVI port and a vga port and you can swap the port to crtc mapping. Cool. I hope someone shows up with a G450 exactly like that to test my theory. > > G450 or G550 using a dual DVI cable. I guess in that case the DacG

Re: Matrox I2C patch

2004-06-14 Thread Ian Romanick
Ryan Underwood wrote: Not a common scenario. I know a lot of G550's come with a DVI and an analog connector, but I've never seen a G450 like that. (The G450 manual claims that they exist., however.) I have a PCI G450 (for PowerPC, no less) that has this configuration. Of course, I can't get it t

Re: Matrox I2C patch

2004-06-14 Thread lindsay . haigh
We use PCI G450s. These have one analogue and one DVI connector on them. We have two cards in the one machine and run two DVI heads with the Matrox HAL lib (required at least for the second card, can't remember if it's required for the first). It is not possible to have two DVI connections on the

Re: Matrox I2C patch

2004-07-09 Thread Ryan Underwood
Would it be possible to take a look at integrating the below patches? I don't see any reason not to include them currently, but I'm open to criticism. The I2C patch doesn't help us with HALlib at the moment, but it has other desirable properties as-is and the HALlib replacement stuff will be most