Quoting Marc Aurele La France <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > I'll look this over. BTW, ...
> > @@ -1066,6 +1067,6 @@
> > break;
> > }
> > xf86ExecX86int10(pVbe->pInt10);
> > -return (pVbe->pInt10->ax == 0x4f);
> > +return (R16(pVbe->pInt10->ax == 0x4f));
> > }
> >
>
> > ... shou
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003, Marc Aurele La France wrote:
> > Does anybody see problems with the attached patch?
> > I think there is some misnaming in the register field names, i.e. instead
> > of "pInt->ax" maybe it should now be called "pInt->eax", anyway, this patch
> > does not change the int10 i
On Thu, 23 Jan 2003 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Does anybody see problems with the attached patch?
> I think there is some misnaming in the register field names, i.e. instead
> of "pInt->ax" maybe it should now be called "pInt->eax", anyway, this patch
> does not change the int10 infrastructure
Title: RE: vbe and driver vesa
if you dont get any further feedback
then i would suggest you to send that patch
to [EMAIL PROTECTED] which gets you a
"ticket" for mainline integration.
i had a look into the patch and
do think its quite simple in effect.
even reverting it tempora
