Re: XFree86 4.4.0 RC2 xf86cfg Solaris build failure

2004-04-04 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote: > >> Is needed here for Solaris? I didn't find it necessary for > >> the Solaris builds I've tried. > >It provides a prototype for keyboard-cfg.c's and monitor-cfg.c's use of > >bzero(). An alternative would be to change them to memset()'s. > Code that u

Re: XFree86 4.4.0 RC2 xf86cfg Solaris build failure

2004-01-08 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Thu, 8 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote: > >> Is needed here for Solaris? I didn't find it necessary for > >> the Solaris builds I've tried. > >It provides a prototype for keyboard-cfg.c's and monitor-cfg.c's use of > >bzero(). An alternative would be to change them to memset()'s. > Code that u

Re: XFree86 4.4.0 RC2 xf86cfg Solaris build failure

2004-01-08 Thread David Dawes
On Thu, Jan 08, 2004 at 08:26:08AM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote: >On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote: > >> >> The inclusion of Xos.h in xf86cfg/config.h causes a conflict with the >> >> inclusion of strings.h on Solaris 2.5.1 x86: > >> >> making all in programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/xf86cfg..

Re: XFree86 4.4.0 RC2 xf86cfg Solaris build failure

2004-01-08 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, David Dawes wrote: > >> The inclusion of Xos.h in xf86cfg/config.h causes a conflict with the > >> inclusion of strings.h on Solaris 2.5.1 x86: > >> making all in programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/xf86cfg... > >> rm -f accessx.o > >> gcc -c -O2 -fno-strength-reduce -DNO_ASM -Wall -W

Re: XFree86 4.4.0 RC2 xf86cfg Solaris build failure

2004-01-08 Thread lindsay . haigh
m> cc: Sent by: Subject: Re: XFree86 4.4.0 RC2 xf86cfg Solaris build failure [EMAI

Re: XFree86 4.4.0 RC2 xf86cfg Solaris build failure

2004-01-07 Thread David Dawes
On Wed, Jan 07, 2004 at 10:32:38AM -0700, Marc Aurele La France wrote: >On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > >> The inclusion of Xos.h in xf86cfg/config.h causes a conflict with the >> inclusion of strings.h on Solaris 2.5.1 x86: > >> making all in programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/xf86cfg... >>

Re: XFree86 4.4.0 RC2 xf86cfg Solaris build failure

2004-01-07 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Marc Aurele La France wrote: I agree changing Xos.h is probably the better fix, but it might break something elsewhere. For 4.4, I think it's sufficient to simply #undef index & rindex before the #include here. The Xos.h we currently ship on Solaris does something very similar: #if (defined(sun)

Re: XFree86 4.4.0 RC2 xf86cfg Solaris build failure

2004-01-07 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > The inclusion of Xos.h in xf86cfg/config.h causes a conflict with the > > inclusion of strings.h on Solaris 2.5.1 x86: > > making all in programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/xf86cfg... > > rm -f accessx.o >

Re: XFree86 4.4.0 RC2 xf86cfg Solaris build failure

2004-01-07 Thread Marc Aurele La France
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > The inclusion of Xos.h in xf86cfg/config.h causes a conflict with the > inclusion of strings.h on Solaris 2.5.1 x86: > making all in programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/xf86cfg... > rm -f accessx.o > gcc -c -O2 -fno-strength-reduce -DNO_ASM -Wall -Wpointer-ar

XFree86 4.4.0 RC2 xf86cfg Solaris build failure

2004-01-06 Thread lindsay . haigh
The inclusion of Xos.h in xf86cfg/config.h causes a conflict with the inclusion of strings.h on Solaris 2.5.1 x86: making all in programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/xf86cfg... rm -f accessx.o gcc -c -O2 -fno-strength-reduce -DNO_ASM -Wall -Wpointer-arith -ansi -pedantic -I../common -I../scanpci -I../lo