On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 04:37:23PM -0500, Rick Beldin wrote:
>David Dawes wrote:
>
>>
>> I'm assuming you mean that there is a 0.0.0.0 address in the
>> connectionAddresses list passed from the X server to the xdm server?
>
> Yes, for example, on a Window XP laptop with lan, wireless,
>
Hi!
Am Dienstag, 13.01.04 um 22:37 Uhr schrieb Rick Beldin:
Seems like a trivial thing for the Xserver to filter out
an IP address of 0.0.0.0 - unless for some bizarre reason
you WANT this address.
0.0.0.0 is an old broadcast address. You probably do not want to use it
as
David Dawes wrote:
I'm assuming you mean that there is a 0.0.0.0 address in the
connectionAddresses list passed from the X server to the xdm server?
Yes, for example, on a Window XP laptop with lan, wireless,
and Nortel VPN software you get the following with the
internal lan c
On Tue, Jan 13, 2004 at 02:58:34PM -0500, Rick Beldin wrote:
>I was looking over some recent changes to xdm in policy.c:
>
> Revision 3.9 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Thu Jan 1 17:12:34
>2004 UTC (12 days, 2 hours ago) by herrb
>Branch: MAIN
>CVS Tags: HEAD
>Changes since 3.8: +2
I was looking over some recent changes to xdm in policy.c:
Revision 3.9 / (download) - annotate - [select for diffs], Thu Jan 1 17:12:34
2004 UTC (12 days, 2 hours ago) by herrb
Branch: MAIN
CVS Tags: HEAD
Changes since 3.8: +23 -2 lines
Diff to previous 3.8 (unified)
When handling a request pa
