behlendorf approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/634#pullrequestreview-125768217
--
openzfs: openzfs-de
tonynguien approved this pull request.
Changes look good.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/634#pullrequestreview-125767347
--
o
On Mon, Jun 4, 2018 at 9:20 PM John Wren Kennedy
wrote:
> Pool creation could definitely be made more efficient. Things to watch out
> for would be that different tests with different numbers of threads would
> want more or fewer files, which would mean they'd want to be different
> sizes. Also,
Pool creation could definitely be made more efficient. Things to watch out for
would be that different tests with different numbers of threads would want more
or fewer files, which would mean they'd want to be different sizes. Also, tests
should be able to run in any order, so we can't make assu
By bringing the original change plus this one back into a SmartOS build, we
seem to be back at the expected `zfs diff` behaviour, at least for a relatively
trivial test case. Thanks!
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on
The sixth annual OpenZFS Developer Summit will be held in San
Francisco, *September
10-11, 2018*. All OpenZFS developers are invited to participate, and
registration is now open.
See http://www.open-zfs.org/wiki/OpenZFS_Developer_Summit for all of the
details, including slides and videos from pre
