I was going to make a post similar to what @behlendorf posted, but I deleted
what I had typed when I realized that we might end up breaking a bunch of
people's scripts who are using non `POSIXLY_CORRECT` option formats. I don't
really have a good answer for how to do that.
--
You are
I wouldn't worry about the encryption related `zfs recv -o / -x` changes until
the PR has been merged into ZoL. It's passing tests right now, but I still need
to add some documentation / man pages to it.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email
match style of original PR (no curly braces)
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/commit/7dec52f2003048788e25e86bd2e6561687c30a76#commitcomment-29548864
tcaputi approved this pull request.
This patch looks good and all the edge cases I could think of are handled
appropriately (zfs upgrade, etc). As a minor convenience, I would want a way to
determine how much memory my metadata cache is using (in ZoL we would make this
a read-only tunable,
@ahrens care to weigh in on how to handle this at all?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/124#issuecomment-321138143
--
tcaputi commented on this pull request.
> @@ -1200,6 +1210,18 @@ transactions.
Not all damaged pools can be recovered by using this option.
If successful, the data from the discarded transactions is irretrievably lost.
This option is ignored if the pool is importable or already imported.
@avg-I
yes it is
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/407#issuecomment-311765827
--
openzfs-developer
Archives:
OK. I will adjust the encryption patch to use bit 24 for raw sends then.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/381#issuecomment-302234139
doesn't the large dnodes send feature use bit 21?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/381#issuecomment-302202756
--
