[developer] Re: [openzfs/openzfs] 9194 mechanism to override ashift at pool creation time (#570)

2018-05-01 Thread Prakash Surya
Closed #570 via 08741101d36c336bfa41ea4a2b535f8608899f1a. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/570#event-1604096507 -- openzfs:

[developer] Re: [openzfs/openzfs] 9194 mechanism to override ashift at pool creation time (#570)

2018-03-09 Thread Richard Elling
richardelling commented on this pull request. > @@ -1431,6 +1433,7 @@ vdev_open(vdev_t *vd) vd->vdev_asize = asize; vd->vdev_max_asize = max_asize; vd->vdev_ashift = MAX(ashift, vd->vdev_ashift); + vd->vdev_ashift =

[developer] Re: [openzfs/openzfs] 9194 mechanism to override ashift at pool creation time (#570)

2018-03-06 Thread brad-lewis
brad-lewis commented on this pull request. > @@ -1431,6 +1433,7 @@ vdev_open(vdev_t *vd) vd->vdev_asize = asize; vd->vdev_max_asize = max_asize; vd->vdev_ashift = MAX(ashift, vd->vdev_ashift); + vd->vdev_ashift =

[developer] Re: [openzfs/openzfs] 9194 mechanism to override ashift at pool creation time (#570)

2018-02-24 Thread Richard Elling
richardelling commented on this pull request. > @@ -1431,6 +1433,7 @@ vdev_open(vdev_t *vd) vd->vdev_asize = asize; vd->vdev_max_asize = max_asize; vd->vdev_ashift = MAX(ashift, vd->vdev_ashift); + vd->vdev_ashift =

[developer] Re: [openzfs/openzfs] 9194 mechanism to override ashift at pool creation time (#570)

2018-02-24 Thread Igor K
ikozhukhov approved this pull request. thanks for update -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/570#pullrequestreview-99114330 --

[developer] Re: [openzfs/openzfs] 9194 mechanism to override ashift at pool creation time (#570)

2018-02-23 Thread Allan Jude
Would be nice to have this. On FreeBSD we currently use the global tunable zfs.min_auto_ashift to accomplish this. -- You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub: