Closed #558 via 92b05f3a18ecbbd541fbd3d9746c173042e49a55.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/558#event-1533512554
--
openzfs:
I opened https://www.illumos.org/issues/9321 and will RTI this today.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/558#issuecomment-374673338
@allanjude Could you file an illumos bug for this? The content can be the same
as your PR description.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/558#issuecomment-373845433
Looks like the Jenkins test failed before it even started the build, can we get
a rerun on this?
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/558#issuecomment-369118860
grwilson approved this pull request.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/558#pullrequestreview-99102002
--
openzfs-developer
@allanjude pushed 1 commit.
73ea8bd fixup! arc_loan_compressed_buf() can increment arc_loaned_bytes by the
wrong value
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
View it on GitHub:
grwilson requested changes on this pull request.
This change looks good, can you also change `arc_loan_buf` to mimic this
change. I think we should always rely on `arc_buf_size` to determine the
correct value to pass to `arc_loaned_bytes_update`
--
You are receiving this because you are
Sorry, missing step to the reproduction case: compressed arc must be disabled.
--
You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/558#issuecomment-366872279