@ilovezfs Regardless of the labeling information you use (MBR, GPT, GPT with
protective MBR, BSD disk label, UFS labels, ZFS labels, GELI encryption labels,
software RAID metadata, etc, etc) there is a possibility for conflict. The only
way to deal with this is to prioritize the order in which
@ryao It looks like you will need to update zdb_001_neg (see the test results;
even without the full log I think the problem is clear).
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
@scsiguy
>The only way to deal with this is to prioritize the order in which handlers
>for these formats attach.
OS X Disk Arbitration has always had FSProbeOrder, so, no, probe order alone is
not a panacea for the described problem, though, yes, like partitioning, probe
order can and does
LGTM
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/22#issuecomment-152831278___
developer mailing list
developer@open-zfs.org
http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
@grwilson I think labeling is quite complicated. ZFS has subsumed many other,
traditionally separate, storage layer components (e.g. volume management, and
software RAID), but doesn't offer a complete replacement for partitioning and
labeling tools. The question is, should ZFS take this over
Looks good to me
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/31#issuecomment-152831553___
developer mailing list
developer@open-zfs.org
http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.csiden.org/r/266/
---
(Updated Nov. 2, 2015, 2:48 a.m.)
Review request for OpenZFS Developer Mailing
@zettabot go
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/17#issuecomment-152888637___
developer mailing list
developer@open-zfs.org
http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
@zettabot go
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/32#issuecomment-152912185___
developer mailing list
developer@open-zfs.org
http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.csiden.org/r/263/
---
(Updated Nov. 2, 2015, 3:07 a.m.)
Review request for OpenZFS Developer Mailing
On Sun, Nov 1, 2015 at 4:36 PM, Alexandre Lécuyer <
alexandre.lecu...@corp.ovh.com> wrote:
> Thank you for reviewing the patch. Sorry about the style and indentation
> issues, I have corrected the ones you mentionned and ran cstyle on all
> changed files.
>
> The webrev is updated, and I have
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.csiden.org/r/266/#review865
---
usr/src/man/man1m/zfs.1m (line 1034)
LGTM
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/21#issuecomment-152831323___
developer mailing list
developer@open-zfs.org
http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
13 matches
Mail list logo
