Re: [developer] feature request "zpool remove "

2016-03-03 Thread Steven Hartland
On 03/03/2016 03:41, PK1048 wrote: On Mar 2, 2016, at 22:14, ilove zfs wrote: Yes, exactly. The unintended consequence of saving one group from a fat-fingered "zpool add" will be dooming another group to pool loss. There are plenty of ways to set yourself up for pool loss. One of the streng

Re: [developer] [offtopic] feature request "zpool remove "

2016-03-03 Thread Trond Endrestøl
Hi, Any chance the list software can remove duplicates? If not, then the members are encouraged to take a glance at the To and Cc headers before hitting send. From: Steven Hartland To: develo...@lists.open-zfs.org Cc: Matthew Ahrens , ray.pat...@gmail.com, developer@open-zfs.org Date: Thu, 3

Re: [developer] feature request "zpool remove "

2016-03-03 Thread Richard Elling
> On Mar 3, 2016, at 1:53 AM, Steven Hartland wrote: > > On 03/03/2016 03:41, PK1048 wrote: >>> On Mar 2, 2016, at 22:14, ilove zfs wrote: >>> >>> Yes, exactly. The unintended consequence of saving one group from a >>> fat-fingered "zpool add" will be dooming another group to pool loss. >> Th

Re: [developer] feature request "zpool remove "

2016-03-03 Thread jason matthews
On 3/2/16 5:08 PM, Matthew Ahrens wrote: I'll read that as "please don't integrate without mirror removal because it will entice people to run 'zpool detach' to reduce their redundancy". Let me know if I've misinterpreted your (Ray and ilovezfs) position. I assume your concern about "total

[developer] an interesting survey -- the zpool with most disks you have ever built

2016-03-03 Thread Fred Liu
Hi, Today when I was reading Jeff's new nuclear weapon -- DSSD D5's CUBIC RAID introduction, the interesting survey -- the zpool with most disks you have ever built popped in my brain. For zfs doesn't support nested vdev, the maximum fault tolerance should be three(from raidz3). It is stranded

[developer] RE: [zfs] an interesting survey -- the zpool with most disks you have ever built

2016-03-03 Thread Fred Liu
From: Freddie Cash [mailto:fjwc...@gmail.com] Sent: 星期五, 三月 04, 2016 13:15 To: z...@lists.illumos.org Cc: omnios-discuss; illumos-dev; freebsd...@freebsd.org; zfs-de...@freebsd.org; Discussion list for OpenIndiana; developer; develo...@lists.open-zfs.org; zfs-disc...@list.zfsonlinux.org; smarto

Re: [developer] feature request "zpool remove "

2016-03-03 Thread Richard Yao
On 03/02/2016 12:31 PM, Matthew Ahrens wrote: > On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Erik Sørnes wrote: > >> Hi! >> >> Are there any plans on implementing functionality to remove an entire vdev >> from a pool ? >> >> One could write zpool remove vdev , and it would >> move the data on to other vdev

[developer] Re: [zfs] an interesting survey -- the zpool with most disks you have ever built

2016-03-03 Thread Freddie Cash
On Mar 3, 2016 8:36 PM, "Fred Liu" wrote: > > Hi, > > Today when I was reading Jeff's new nuclear weapon -- DSSD D5's CUBIC RAID introduction, > the interesting survey -- the zpool with most disks you have ever built popped in my brain. We have two backups servers with 90 drives each (2x 45-bay J

Re: [developer] feature request "zpool remove "

2016-03-03 Thread Paul B. Henson
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 12:50:15AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote: > My vote is for "Please don't integrate without mirror/RAID-Z > support - all ZFS features should work together." I think all the people who have ever accidentally added a non-redundant top level vdev and screwed themselves with no way

Re: [developer] feature request "zpool remove "

2016-03-03 Thread Richard Yao
On 03/04/2016 12:50 AM, Richard Yao wrote: > On 03/02/2016 12:31 PM, Matthew Ahrens wrote: >> On Wed, Mar 2, 2016 at 12:37 AM, Erik Sørnes wrote: >> >>> Hi! >>> >>> Are there any plans on implementing functionality to remove an entire vdev >>> from a pool ? >>> >>> One could write zpool remove vd

Re: [developer] feature request "zpool remove "

2016-03-03 Thread Richard Yao
On 03/04/2016 01:27 AM, Paul B. Henson wrote: > On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 12:50:15AM -0500, Richard Yao wrote: > >> My vote is for "Please don't integrate without mirror/RAID-Z >> support - all ZFS features should work together." > > I think all the people who have ever accidentally added a non-red

Re: [developer] feature request "zpool remove "

2016-03-03 Thread ilove zfs
--- openzfs-developer Archives: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/274414/=now RSS Feed: https://www.listbox.com/member/archive/rss/274414/28015062-cce53afa Modify Your Subscription: https://www.listbox.com/member/?member_id=28015062&id_secret=280150