On Fri, Jul 8, 2016 at 9:03 AM, George Wilson
wrote:
> Andriy,
>
> I think this is basically a rule, although I don't think it's stated
> anywhere. We do rely heavily on this locking strategy since there are many
> places that will hold the namespace lock to prevent
Great, detailed traversal of I/Os down to disk and back. Thanks, Matt (and
Kirk).
-Albert
On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 3:55 PM, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
> Earlier this year I recorded a lecture for Marshall Kirk McKusick's class,
> FreeBSD Kernel Internals: An Intensive Code
This is a pretty critical issue even though exposure is more limited now. The
ZoL solution looks simpler to me, are there additional merits for the FreeBSD
one (which @ahrens has already blessed)?
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
LGTM.
---
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub:
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/16#issuecomment-151748375___
developer mailing list
developer@open-zfs.org
http://lists.open-zfs.org/mailman/listinfo/developer
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.csiden.org/r/243/#review783
---
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Albert Lee
On Sept. 20, 2015, 5:56 p.m
net effect is
that deleted snapshots don't get their deadlisted blocks reclaimed?
- Albert Lee
On Sept. 20, 2015, 5:57 p.m., Matthew Ahrens wrote:
>
> ---
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit
---
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.csiden.org/r/146/#review399
---
Ship it!
Good work spotting this.
- Albert Lee
On Dec. 9, 2014, 10