On Mon, Jul 07, 2014 at 09:33:13AM +0200, Jan Schmidt wrote:
> ... several times (like 10 times each). After that, a full scrub of the pool
> succeeded without any messages.
>
> Do you think it is safe to continue using the repaired pool, or would you
> still
> recommend to recreate it?
What Ge
On 7/7/14, 3:33 AM, Jan Schmidt via illumos-zfs wrote:
On Wed, June 25, 2014 at 16:15 (+0200), Keith Wesolowski Via Illumos-zfs wrote:
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 01:47:54PM +0200, Jan Schmidt via illumos-zfs wrote:
That patch looks somewhat promising, though I have not tried it yet. How did you
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 7:15 AM, Keith Wesolowski <
keith.wesolow...@joyent.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 01:47:54PM +0200, Jan Schmidt via illumos-zfs
> wrote:
>
> > That patch looks somewhat promising, though I have not tried it yet. How
> did you
> > decide which of the overlapping spac
On Wed, June 25, 2014 at 12:16 (+0200), Pawel Jakub Dawidek Via Illumos-zfs
wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:09:07PM +0200, Jan Schmidt via illumos-zfs wrote:
>> It seems that we've hit what is described in
>> https://www.illumos.org/issues/4390. To me it looks like the mentioned fixes
>> ar
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 01:47:54PM +0200, Jan Schmidt via illumos-zfs wrote:
> That patch looks somewhat promising, though I have not tried it yet. How did
> you
> decide which of the overlapping space map ranges to drop? From my
> understanding,
> either range might be the one that's currently
On Wed, Jun 25, 2014 at 12:09:07PM +0200, Jan Schmidt via illumos-zfs wrote:
> It seems that we've hit what is described in
> https://www.illumos.org/issues/4390. To me it looks like the mentioned fixes
> are
> only preventing the pool corruption to occur in the first place.
>
> How to recover a
