I have 2 outstanding review requests that I could use feedback on. These
have been open for quite a while so I'm probably going to RTI them this
weekend.
Provide mechanism to artificially limit disk performance
https://github.com/openzfs/openzfs/pull/39
This patch hijacks the existing 'zinject -
Any takers for these reviews? If not then I'll RTI with just the Delphix
reviewers and see how that goes.
(Thanks to Jeff Sipek for reviewing one of them!)
https://reviews.csiden.org/r/172/
5694 traverse_prefetcher does not prefetch enough
https://reviews.csiden.org/r/174/
5696 ::refcount -r do
All looks good Matt.
I committed something very similar in FreeBSD a while back as it was
breaking our TRIM support, so yes count me as a reviewer :)
Regards
Steve
On 26/10/2014 15:54, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
I don't see it. Did you have feedback or should I just count you as a
review
I don't see it. Did you have feedback or should I just count you as a
reviewer?
--matt
On Sat, Oct 25, 2014 at 9:25 PM, Steven Hartland
wrote:
> I replied to 119 did it get through?
>
>
> On 26/10/2014 01:43, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
>
>> Anyone interested in reviewing these changes?
>>
>> https:
I replied to 119 did it get through?
On 26/10/2014 01:43, Matthew Ahrens wrote:
Anyone interested in reviewing these changes?
https://reviews.csiden.org/r/119/
5244 zio pipeline callers should explicitly invoke next stage
(Related to the thread "zfs zio reordering in zio_vdev_io_start
causing
Anyone interested in reviewing these changes?
https://reviews.csiden.org/r/119/
5244 zio pipeline callers should explicitly invoke next stage
(Related to the thread "zfs zio reordering in zio_vdev_io_start causing
panics" from April 2014)
https://reviews.csiden.org/r/118/
5243 zdb -b could be muc
I have several review requests that have been outstanding for more than 7
days. If you would like to review these changes, please do so by Tuesday
the 30th, or let me know if you need more time.
3693 restore_object uses at least two transactions to restore an object
https://reviews.csiden.org/r/9
