On Wed, 12 Feb 2020 15:33:08 -0600
Ken Gaillot wrote:
> On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 16:17 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> > Last mail for today :)
> >
> > At least three actions exists in the OCF specs and are not fully
> > supported in
> > Pacemaker.
> >
> > 1. recovery
> >
> > Today,
On Wed, 2020-02-12 at 16:17 +0100, Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais wrote:
> Last mail for today :)
>
> At least three actions exists in the OCF specs and are not fully
> supported in
> Pacemaker.
>
> 1. recovery
>
> Today, Pacemaker replace this action with a stop/start or
> demote/stop/start/pr
Last mail for today :)
At least three actions exists in the OCF specs and are not fully supported in
Pacemaker.
1. recovery
Today, Pacemaker replace this action with a stop/start or
demote/stop/start/promote transition. I bet some RA (at least PAF) would be
able to deal with a recovery the
