Really sorry, folks. :\ I made the fatal error of jumping the gun
before waiting for testing bot results on a "trivial" patch http://drupal.org/node/471234
which just so happened to break the installer. Oops. :\
I'm pretty sure I reset the statuses of all the issues that were
mistakenly "ne
In a much lower voice, have you seen that Steef largely stopped
contributing? Guess why: mostly because the old small community
feeling of Drupal is waning and there is too much "clients" around.
Think.
If we were here to satisfy clients with core then all the core files
would be writeable by Apache so you can just update them from a
browser. We do not do that. However, we DO recognize the need for that
and I have spec'd out somewhat Plugin Manager which Joshua Rogers has
written as a GSoC project
On a side note, I'm a huge fan of the WYSIWYG API (
http://drupal.org/project/wysiwyg ). Bravo to this project and others
in recently moving the third party code over to
"|sites/all/libraries/" |it should make future Drupal upgrades much
easier to manage.
Second the kudos for the WYSIWY
Hi,
fckeditor does a good job:
http://docs.fckeditor.net/FCKeditor_2.x/Users_Guide/Common_Tasks/Cut%
2C_Copy_and_Paste
fckeditor has a paste from word option, Point 3 on the website
best
Thomas Zahreddin
Ryan Cross wrote:
Do you know of any other site or WYSIWYG editor that handles M$ word
better than what's available?
I don't think there is one, otherwise I'm sure it would be quite
popular. I'd be happy to be proven wrong though. I just don't want
people chasing a mythical "perfect" wysiwyg edi
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 9:06 AM, Walt Daniels wrote:
> My sentiments, exactly! If the users can't use it without problems they will
> leave you site for one that is more user friendly. Without problems means
> whatever ugly hacks under the covers are needed to really strip Word junk.
> They don't
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 9:19 AM, Ryan Cross wrote:
> On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Walt Daniels
> wrote:
> > My sentiments, exactly! If the users can't use it without problems they
> will
> > leave you site for one that is more user friendly. Without problems means
> > whatever ugly hacks un
On Sun, May 24, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Walt Daniels wrote:
> My sentiments, exactly! If the users can't use it without problems they will
> leave you site for one that is more user friendly. Without problems means
> whatever ugly hacks under the covers are needed to really strip Word junk.
> They don't
My sentiments, exactly! If the users can't use it without problems they will
leave you site for one that is more user friendly. Without problems means
whatever ugly hacks under the covers are needed to really strip Word junk.
They don't understand the need to use paste from Word (in tinyMCE) and it
10 matches
Mail list logo
